Skip to content

Conversation

@Pr0methean
Copy link
Member

This PR applies 3/3 suggestions from code quality AI findings.

Pr0methean and others added 3 commits January 15, 2026 14:56
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <223894421+github-code-quality[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Hennick <4961925+Pr0methean@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <223894421+github-code-quality[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Hennick <4961925+Pr0methean@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <223894421+github-code-quality[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Hennick <4961925+Pr0methean@users.noreply.github.com>
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @Pr0methean, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses three code quality findings by refining an example file. It renames two functions, real_main to run_zip_writer and doit to write_zip_file, to enhance their descriptive clarity. Additionally, a lengthy LOREM_IPSUM constant has been condensed to improve the readability and conciseness of the example code.

Highlights

  • Function Renaming for Clarity: The real_main function in examples/write_sample.rs has been renamed to run_zip_writer to better reflect its purpose as the entry point for the zip writing example.
  • Function Renaming for Specificity: The doit function in examples/write_sample.rs has been renamed to write_zip_file to provide a more descriptive and specific name for its role in handling the zip file writing logic.
  • LOREM_IPSUM Constant Shortening: The LOREM_IPSUM constant in examples/write_sample.rs has been significantly shortened to a more concise version, improving readability and reducing the overall line count of the example file.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@Pr0methean Pr0methean changed the title Potential fixes for 3 code quality findings docs(example): Potential fixes for 3 code quality findings in examples/write_sample.rs Jan 15, 2026
Copy link
Contributor

@amazon-q-developer amazon-q-developer bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review Summary

This PR applies code quality improvements by renaming functions to be more descriptive and replacing an excessively long Lorem Ipsum constant with a more reasonable version. The changes improve code readability and maintainability without affecting functionality.

Key Changes:

  • Renamed real_main() to run_zip_writer() for better clarity
  • Renamed doit() to write_zip_file() to be more descriptive
  • Replaced lengthy Lorem Ipsum text with a concise standard version

Note: The PR title should follow Conventional Commits format (e.g., refactor: improve function names and reduce lorem ipsum text size) as specified in the project guidelines.

The code changes are solid and ready for merge once the title is updated to follow the project's commit conventions.


You can now have the agent implement changes and create commits directly on your pull request's source branch. Simply comment with /q followed by your request in natural language to ask the agent to make changes.

@Pr0methean Pr0methean marked this pull request as ready for review January 15, 2026 22:57
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request improves code quality by renaming functions for better clarity (e.g., real_main to run_zip_writer and doit to write_zip_file) and by reformatting a long string constant to be more readable. These are great changes for maintainability. I've just left one minor suggestion to remove some extraneous blank lines.

Signed-off-by: Chris Hennick <4961925+Pr0methean@users.noreply.github.com>
@Pr0methean Pr0methean enabled auto-merge January 15, 2026 22:58
@Pr0methean Pr0methean added this to the 7.1.1 milestone Jan 15, 2026
@Pr0methean Pr0methean modified the milestones: 7.1.1, 7.2.0 Jan 17, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants