build-gnu.sh: Fail 2 help-version*.sh instead of removing

[oech3]

We should pass someday. Keep marking them failing.

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

Note: The gnu test tests/tail/inotify-dir-recreate is now being skipped but was previously passing.

[sylvestre]

not sure i see the difference between false and removing them

[oech3]

Removing tests masks existense of tests from people completely. This method lists them to failing tests and someone saw them might interested in them.

[oech3]

Like https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/actions/runs/20464039880/job/58803258630?pr=9796#step:11:262 .
This is not existing at main branch.

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

GNU test failed: tests/tty/tty-eof. tests/tty/tty-eof is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?

[oech3]

coreutils/util/build-gnu.sh

Lines 355 to 358 in bea05bb

	# Disable this test, it is not relevant for us:
	# * the selinux crate is handling errors
	# * the test says "maybe we should not fail when no context available"
	"${SED}" -i -e "s|returns_ 1||g" tests/cp/no-ctx.sh

?

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

GNU test failed: tests/cp/no-ctx. tests/cp/no-ctx is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Note: The gnu test tests/csplit/csplit-heap is now being skipped but was previously passing.
Note: The gnu test tests/printf/printf-surprise is now being skipped but was previously passing.
Note: The gnu test tests/rm/many-dir-entries-vs-OOM is now being skipped but was previously passing.

[sylvestre]

GNU testsuite comparison:

GNU test failed: tests/cp/no-ctx. tests/cp/no-ctx is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Note: The gnu test tests/csplit/csplit-heap is now being skipped but was previously passing.
Note: The gnu test tests/printf/printf-surprise is now being skipped but was previously passing.
Note: The gnu test tests/rm/many-dir-entries-vs-OOM is now being skipped but was previously passing.

i guess it is unexpected, no ?

[oech3]

unexpected

[oech3]

I will revert no-ctx after CI's traffic jam was solved.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #9796 will improve performance by 3.67%

_{Comparing oech3:patch-2 (be38d39) with main (fd68328)¹}

Summary

⚡ 1 improvement
✅ 135 untouched
⏩ 15 skipped²

Benchmarks breakdown

	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
⚡	cp_large_file[16]	362.2 µs	349.4 µs	+3.67%

Footnotes

1. No successful run was found on main (c8c412c) during the generation of this report, so fd68328 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

2. 15 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩