Skip to content

Conversation

@happz
Copy link
Contributor

@happz happz commented Dec 4, 2025

Pull Request Checklist

  • implement the feature
  • write the documentation
  • extend the test coverage
  • update the specification
  • adjust plugin docstring
  • modify the json schema
  • mention the version
  • include a release note

@happz happz added the ci | full test Pull request is ready for the full test execution label Dec 4, 2025
@happz happz force-pushed the provision-mock-container-into-distinct-jobs branch from e7efd52 to abc7325 Compare December 4, 2025 09:19
@happz happz force-pushed the provision-mock-container-into-distinct-jobs branch from abc7325 to fafc6f2 Compare December 4, 2025 09:41
@psss psss added the area | maintenance Changes important for efficiency and the long-term health of the project label Dec 4, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@LecrisUT LecrisUT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just minor moving around

Comment on lines +134 to +135
# TODO: can I merge `provision` and `internal`? They seem to fight over `tf_extra_params`,
# dropping keys.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did try this one at some point, and iirc it does an update, of the previously defined fields, so the conflict should be fine.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I tried, virtual check found no tests as it was missing the custom context. Will try again.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

packit validate should show the final yaml file, but we should see this from a simple yaml.load also.

- tmt:
context:
how: provision
<<: *tmt-cloud-resources
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change

I believe you want to remove this, otherwise it is the same as internal except for missing use_internal_tf?

Comment on lines +148 to +151
settings:
provisioning:
tags:
BusinessUnit: tmt
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
settings:
provisioning:
tags:
BusinessUnit: tmt
<<: *tmt-cloud-resources

We already have a shortcut :)

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to backlog in planning Dec 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area | maintenance Changes important for efficiency and the long-term health of the project ci | full test Pull request is ready for the full test execution

Projects

Status: backlog

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants