-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.6k
[Test][AutoDiff] Replace sed command with echo/cat for internal shell compatibility #85842
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
emirariemir
wants to merge
4
commits into
swiftlang:main
Choose a base branch
from
emirariemir:fix-auto-diff-sed-commands
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+20
−35
Open
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5e44c04
[Test][AutoDiff] Replace sed with echo/cat in sil_differentiability_w…
emirariemir 8f5d318
[Test][AutoDiff] Replace sed with echo/cat in differentiable_function…
emirariemir 30451f9
[Test][AutoDiff] Replace sed with echo/cat for Lit shell
emirariemir 6e934ec
[Test][AutoDiff] Make differentiability witness checks tolerant of Wi…
emirariemir File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I do not recall all all restrictions of internal shell, does one of the following work instead?
or even
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that the
<(...)syntax is only supported by BASH and not by internal shell, so that test would fail in Windows CI or shells other than Bash. I think keeping it as two atomic, standard commands is the most robust approach (thanks to @hnrklssn for suggesting this approach in the first place):There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this so for pipe as well? I believe this is something that should be supported (see https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/2a10e91d8f2edf20bb0e6680e668b327334dc6e8/llvm/utils/lit/tests/Inputs/shtest-shell/diff-pipes.txt)
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Chiming in here, lit's shell doesn't give you much to work with. You can't use process substitution and you can't use echo if it's piped to another command. At least with the two line approach it keeps things simple.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pipes are supported in general, the one limitation is that the built-in version of
echodoes not support pipes. Another option would be to create a filetest/AutoDiff/SIL/import_Differentiation.txtcontainingimport _Differentiation, and usecat %S/import_Differentiation.txt %t/tmp.sil > %t/tmp_fixed.sil. No strong preference from my end though.