Skip to content

Conversation

@subbaparitala9
Copy link

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Owner

  1. Correctness: The solution correctly implements a queue using two stacks, but the peek operation has an unnecessary print statement that should be removed.
  2. Time Complexity: The student claims O(1) time complexity, but it should be amortized O(1) with worst-case O(n) when the out_stack is empty. This should be clarified.
  3. Space Complexity: Correctly identified as O(n).
  4. Code Quality: The code is well-structured and readable. The print statement in the peek method should be removed as it's not needed for functionality.
  5. Efficiency: The peek operation can be optimized by calling the pop operation's logic to refill the out_stack if needed, similar to the reference solution. This avoids code duplication.

Suggestions for improvement:

  • Remove the print statement in the peek method.
  • Consider combining the logic for refilling the out_stack in a helper method to avoid duplication between pop and peek.
  • Update the time complexity explanation to reflect the amortized analysis.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants