Skip to content

Conversation

@SylvainSenechal
Copy link
Contributor

@SylvainSenechal SylvainSenechal commented Dec 1, 2025

Issue: CLDSRVCLT-2

@bert-e
Copy link

bert-e commented Dec 1, 2025

Hello sylvainsenechal,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options
name description privileged authored
/after_pull_request Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval Bypass the pull request author's approval
/bypass_build_status Bypass the build and test status
/bypass_commit_size Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA
/bypass_incompatible_branch Bypass the check on the source branch prefix
/bypass_jira_check Bypass the Jira issue check
/bypass_peer_approval Bypass the pull request peers' approval
/bypass_leader_approval Bypass the pull request leaders' approval
/approve Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request. ✍️
/create_pull_requests Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.
Available commands
name description privileged
/help Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request TBA
/clear Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

- name: Wait for metadata to be ready
run: |
set -o pipefail
bash .github/workflows/wait_for_local_port.bash 9000 40
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@SylvainSenechal SylvainSenechal Dec 1, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also stolen from cloudserver, need it to run metadata backend

@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Dec 1, 2025
@bert-e
Copy link

bert-e commented Dec 1, 2025

Waiting for approval

The following approvals are needed before I can proceed with the merge:

  • the author

  • 2 peers

@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Dec 1, 2025
@SylvainSenechal SylvainSenechal force-pushed the improvement/CLDSRVCLT-2 branch 2 times, most recently from 7fa7e8b to 96e82f2 Compare December 1, 2025 11:29
@SylvainSenechal SylvainSenechal marked this pull request as ready for review December 1, 2025 11:31
@SylvainSenechal SylvainSenechal force-pushed the improvement/CLDSRVCLT-2 branch 2 times, most recently from c63bfee to 22f1240 Compare December 1, 2025 15:57
.eslintrc.js Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
module.exports = {
parser: '@typescript-eslint/parser',

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we have a scality one too ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not too sure about this, on other codebases i see an eslint.config.mjs file that's more complex, don't know if I should use something similar or not

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I prefer yours to be honest but. i think we can extends also the one from scality. It's just an extends, so should be fine ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i extended the one from scality

@SylvainSenechal SylvainSenechal force-pushed the improvement/CLDSRVCLT-2 branch 2 times, most recently from 17dca6a to b424f76 Compare December 3, 2025 11:06

cloudserver-metadata:
image: ghcr.io/scality/cloudserver:9.1.4
platform: linux/amd64

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is this really needed ? ( it's mac specific I think )

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah yeah, so it's indeed useless for the ci, but for mac dev who wants to start the docker-compose locally, it will be useful so that's why I added it

.eslintrc.js Outdated
Comment on lines 23 to 24
'@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any': 'warn',
'@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars': ['error', { argsIgnorePattern: '^_' }],

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are we sure we only want these two rules ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

actually im gonna extend the scality linter, hold on

- MONGODB_HOSTS=mongodb:27018
- MONGODB_RS=rs0
- REMOTE_MANAGEMENT_DISABLE=true
- SCALITY_ACCESS_KEY_ID=accessKey1

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not sure it's very safe to put this here in general => should be a secret instead

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removed, actually not needed at all since they are used by default when not provided

@SylvainSenechal SylvainSenechal force-pushed the improvement/CLDSRVCLT-2 branch from de57b47 to 0b8ba1f Compare December 9, 2025 16:43
@SylvainSenechal SylvainSenechal force-pushed the improvement/CLDSRVCLT-2 branch from 8dd3788 to 58ae441 Compare December 9, 2025 17:09
@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Dec 10, 2025
@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Dec 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants