-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 382
Align _choose_qparams_affine with _choose_scale_float8 behavior #3447
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
AryanBagade
wants to merge
1
commit into
pytorch:main
Choose a base branch
from
AryanBagade:fix-issue-3324-align-choose-qparams
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+36
−16
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is this needed?
keepdim=Trueis already used in int8_tensor.pyEdit: oh OK I think it is needed because the reshapes we are doing before
ao/torchao/quantization/quant_primitives.py
Line 1554 in aa21b80
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, this reshape is needed! int8_tensor.py passes scale/zero_point directly to
quantize_affine, which internally reshapes the scale at line 461. So it doesn't need the output to be pre-reshaped. but the thing is, IntxUnpackedToInt8Tensor.init (lines131-136) asserts thatscale.shapemust exactly matchtuple(n_blocks)before passing toquantize_affine:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
basically without this reshape:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah that's correct, I'll approve the CI to run all the tests to see, especially this one:
ao/test/quantization/test_quant_primitives.py
Line 569 in aa21b80
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
also in a future PR we could remove some of the reshaping logic in quantize_affine/dequantize _affine as well:
ao/torchao/quantization/quant_primitives.py
Lines 453 to 461 in aa21b80
also eventually remove the block_size arg from these ops (bc-breaking)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sure, sounds like a plan, happy to contribute