Skip to content

Conversation

@TheRealMDoerr
Copy link
Contributor

@TheRealMDoerr TheRealMDoerr commented Dec 5, 2025

This is a new fix for JDK-8361117 for OpenJDK. I can't see the corresponding fix because it's not public.

This fix is taken from openjdk/jdk@05a0a71.
The problem is described in https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/674cc3eeca77f1f2a6d937b1df5c5cd8a13c2d31/test/hotspot/jtreg/compiler/arraycopy/TestACSameSrcDst.java#L87 but that regression test didn't reproduce the issue in jdk17u.

I've taken the reproducer from the issue and put it into a new regression test. The VM crashes without the fix and the test passes with the fix.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8361117 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8361117: SIGSEGV in LShiftLNode::Ideal due to unexpected dead node (Bug - P2 - Approved)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/4204/head:pull/4204
$ git checkout pull/4204

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/4204
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/4204/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 4204

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 4204

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4204.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 5, 2025

👋 Welcome back mdoerr! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 5, 2025

@TheRealMDoerr This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8361117: SIGSEGV in LShiftLNode::Ideal due to unexpected dead node

Reviewed-by: roland

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 6 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title backport 8361117 8361117: SIGSEGV in LShiftLNode::Ideal due to unexpected dead node Dec 5, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 5, 2025

This backport pull request has now been updated with the original issue, but not the original commit. If you have the original commit hash, please update the pull request title with Backport <hash>.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Dec 5, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 5, 2025

Webrevs

@TheRealMDoerr
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rwestrel: Do you want to review?

Copy link
Contributor

@rwestrel rwestrel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Otherwise, looks good to me.


package compiler.c2;

public class Test8361117 {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you rename the test case? The usual guideline is to not name test cases based on the bug id but rather have a short descriptive name.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done. Please take a look.

Copy link
Contributor

@rwestrel rwestrel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for making the change. Looks good to me.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 8, 2025

⚠️ @TheRealMDoerr This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@TheRealMDoerr
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the review!

@openjdk openjdk bot added approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received labels Dec 8, 2025
@TheRealMDoerr
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 9, 2025

Going to push as commit 58dab5e.
Since your change was applied there have been 6 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Dec 9, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Dec 9, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Dec 9, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 9, 2025

@TheRealMDoerr Pushed as commit 58dab5e.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@TheRealMDoerr TheRealMDoerr deleted the 8361117_C2_LShift_idealization branch December 9, 2025 09:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants