Skip to content

Conversation

@omar-coderabbitai
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

omar-coderabbitai and others added 5 commits May 27, 2025 17:23
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Added unit tests for get_temperature and main functions.
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 10, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Temperature lookup functionality for U.S. cities with formatted results
    • Comprehensive input validation and error handling for network failures, timeouts, and invalid responses
    • Environment-based API key configuration
  • Tests

    • Full test coverage including success paths and error scenarios

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

Walkthrough

Introduces a new Python module for fetching current Fahrenheit temperatures from the OpenWeatherMap API for U.S. cities. Includes get_temperature() with comprehensive error handling for HTTP errors, timeouts, and JSON parsing, and main() for CLI interaction with environment-based API key configuration. Comprehensive unit tests included.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Weather Temperature Module
weather-app.py
Added get_temperature(city_name, api_key) to fetch current Fahrenheit temperature from OpenWeatherMap API with error handling for HTTP errors, connection issues, timeouts, JSON parsing errors, and unexpected response structures. Added main() function to read API key from environment, prompt for city input with validation, call get_temperature(), and display formatted results or error messages. Includes comprehensive unit tests with mocks covering success paths, various error conditions, input validation, and output formatting.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes

  • API key validation and secure handling practices
  • Completeness of HTTP error handling and edge cases (network timeouts, malformed JSON, unexpected API response structures)
  • Unit test mock implementation accuracy and coverage of all error paths
  • Input validation robustness and handling of empty/invalid city names
  • Verification that OpenWeatherMap API response parsing matches actual API structure and imperial units configuration

Poem

🐰 A weather app hops into place,
With temps from every time and space!
Through API calls and errors caught,
The forecast that the user sought! ☀️🌧️

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 2 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Unit Test Coverage ⚠️ Warning Unit tests are comprehensively designed covering success paths, error conditions, input validation, and formatting, but cannot execute due to invalid module naming and structural issues. Rename file from weather-app.py to weather_app.py, update all imports and @patch decorators accordingly, remove duplicate main block, and verify tests execute successfully with coverage metrics.
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'Og test feature' is vague and generic, using non-descriptive terms that don't convey meaningful information about the actual changeset, which introduces a weather app with temperature fetching and comprehensive tests. Revise the title to specifically describe the main change, such as 'Add weather app with temperature fetching functionality' or 'Implement OpenWeatherMap integration for temperature queries'.
Description check ❓ Inconclusive No pull request description was provided by the author, making it impossible to assess whether the description relates to the changeset. Add a pull request description explaining the purpose of the weather app, the functionality being introduced, and any relevant implementation details or testing approach.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed Docstring coverage is 94.74% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch og-test-feature

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b534b4b and 707ef30.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • weather-app.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/**

⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file

**/**: - Only comment on issues that would block merging — ignore minor or stylistic concerns.

  • Restrict feedback to errors, security risks, or functionality-breaking problems.
  • Do not post comments on code style, formatting, or non-critical improvements.
  • Keep reviews short: flag only issues that make the PR unsafe to merge.
  • Limit review comments to 3–5 items maximum, unless additional blockers exist.
  • Group similar issues into a single comment instead of posting multiple notes.
  • Skip repetition — if a pattern repeats, mention it once at a summary level only.
  • Do not add general suggestions, focus strictly on merge-blocking concerns.
  • If there are no critical problems, respond with minimal approval (e.g., 'Looks good'). Do not add additional review.
  • Avoid line-by-line commentary unless it highlights a critical bug or security hole.
  • Highlight only issues that could cause runtime errors, data loss, or severe maintainability
    issues.
  • Ignore minor optimization opportunities — focus solely on correctness and safety.
  • Provide a top-level summary of critical blockers rather than detailed per-line notes.
  • Comment only when the issue must be resolved before merge — otherwise remain silent.
  • When in doubt, err on the side of fewer comments — brevity and blocking issues only.
  • Avoid posting any refactoring issues

Files:

  • weather-app.py
🪛 Ruff (0.14.8)
weather-app.py

75-75: Expected import, found -

(invalid-syntax)


75-75: Simple statements must be separated by newlines or semicolons

(invalid-syntax)

Comment on lines +37 to +44
except requests.exceptions.HTTPError as http_err:
print(f"HTTP error occurred: {http_err}")
except requests.exceptions.ConnectionError:
print("Error: Network connection error.")
except requests.exceptions.Timeout:
print("Error: The request timed out.")
except requests.exceptions.RequestException as err:
print(f"Error: An unexpected error occurred: {err}")
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

HTTP error logging may leak the OpenWeather API key

except requests.exceptions.HTTPError as http_err: followed by:

print(f"HTTP error occurred: {http_err}")

will typically include the full request URL in the exception message, which for OpenWeather contains the appid query parameter (your API key). This risks exposing the secret in logs/terminal output.

Consider logging only the status code and reason (without the full URL) or redacting the query string before printing.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In weather-app.py around lines 37 to 44, the HTTP error printout may expose the
OpenWeather API key because the exception message can include the full request
URL; replace the current print of the raw exception with code that avoids
leaking the URL by either (a) extracting and logging only
http_err.response.status_code and http_err.response.reason (or response.text if
needed) or (b) if you must log the URL, parse and redact the query string before
printing; ensure you reference http_err.response safely (check for None) and
never include the full request URL or query parameters in logs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants