📝 Add docstrings to og-test-feature

[coderabbitai]

Docstrings generation was requested by @omar-coderabbitai.

• Add weather-app.py script to fetch current temperature using OpenWeatherMap API #2 (comment)

The following files were modified:

• weather-app.py

ℹ️ Note

CodeRabbit cannot perform edits on its own pull requests yet.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Enhanced documentation describing system behavior and functionality.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Updated docstrings in weather-app.py with a more generic description for get_temperature and added comprehensive documentation to main detailing user prompts, environment variable retrieval, and error messaging behavior. No functional logic or control flow modifications.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Documentation Updates weather-app.py	Refined get_temperature docstring with generic description and updated parameter/return documentation; added detailed main function docstring documenting user prompts, environment variable retrieval, and error messaging behavior

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes

This is a pure documentation update with no functional or structural code changes. Review involves confirming docstring accuracy and clarity.

Poem

🐰✨ The docs now shine so bright and clear,
Where functions whisper far and near,
No logic bent, no flow confused,
Just words refined and well-perused—
A rabbit's touch to guide us through! 📚

Pre-merge checks

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Unit Test Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Pull request modifies weather-app.py with docstrings but adds no unit tests despite code handling external API calls and error scenarios requiring test coverage.	Create test_weather_app.py with pytest/unittest covering get_temperature() and main() functions, including valid/invalid API responses, error conditions, and user input handling using mocking.
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title includes an emoji and uses backticks, which constitute noise. While it accurately describes the main change (adding docstrings), the emoji and backtick formatting reduce clarity for history scanning.	Consider revising to: 'Add docstrings to weather-app' - removing the emoji and backticks for better clarity and consistency with scanning commit history.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b27abc1 and 7076966.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• weather-app.py (2 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (1)

**/**

⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file

**/**: - Only comment on issues that would block merging — ignore minor or stylistic concerns.

• Restrict feedback to errors, security risks, or functionality-breaking problems.
• Do not post comments on code style, formatting, or non-critical improvements.
• Keep reviews short: flag only issues that make the PR unsafe to merge.
• Limit review comments to 3–5 items maximum, unless additional blockers exist.
• Group similar issues into a single comment instead of posting multiple notes.
• Skip repetition — if a pattern repeats, mention it once at a summary level only.
• Do not add general suggestions, focus strictly on merge-blocking concerns.
• If there are no critical problems, respond with minimal approval (e.g., 'Looks good'). Do not add additional review.
• Avoid line-by-line commentary unless it highlights a critical bug or security hole.
• Highlight only issues that could cause runtime errors, data loss, or severe maintainability
  issues.
• Ignore minor optimization opportunities — focus solely on correctness and safety.
• Provide a top-level summary of critical blockers rather than detailed per-line notes.
• Comment only when the issue must be resolved before merge — otherwise remain silent.
• When in doubt, err on the side of fewer comments — brevity and blocking issues only.
• Avoid posting any refactoring issues

Files:

• weather-app.py

Tip

📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!

You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.

• Provide your own instructions using the high_level_summary_instructions setting.
• Format the summary however you like (bullet lists, tables, multi-section layouts, contributor stats, etc.).
• Use high_level_summary_in_walkthrough to move the summary from the description to the walkthrough section.

Example instruction:

"Divide the high-level summary into five sections:

1. 📝 Description — Summarize the main change in 50–60 words, explaining what was done.
2. 📓 References — List relevant issues, discussions, documentation, or related PRs.
3. 📦 Dependencies & Requirements — Mention any new/updated dependencies, environment variable changes, or configuration updates.
4. 📊 Contributor Summary — Include a Markdown table showing contributions:
   | Contributor | Lines Added | Lines Removed | Files Changed |
5. ✔️ Additional Notes — Add any extra reviewer context.
   Keep each section concise (under 200 words) and use bullet or numbered lists for clarity."

Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later.

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[omar-coderabbitai]

test

[omar-coderabbitai]

@coderabbitai full review

[coderabbitai]

✅ Actions performed

Full review triggered.