feat: add implicit s3:DeleteObject grant for s3tables:DeleteTable #211
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
s3tables:DeleteTablealso grantss3:DeleteObjectDROP TABLE ... PURGE) to delete underlying data files in the table's storage locationBackground
When using Spark's
DROP TABLE ... PURGE, the operation fails because users withs3tables:DeleteTablepermission don't have thes3:DeleteObjectpermission needed to delete the underlying data files.This is a workaround for a Spark/Iceberg issue where
DROP TABLE ... PURGEperforms client-side deletes rather than usingpurgeRequested=trueto let the catalog handle deletion server-side.References
RCK fix