Skip to content

Conversation

@XuehaiPan
Copy link
Member

@XuehaiPan XuehaiPan commented Oct 8, 2025

Description

Describe your changes in detail.

Motivation and Context

Why is this change required? What problem does it solve?
If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here.
You can use the syntax close #15213 if this solves the issue #15213

  • I have raised an issue to propose this change (required for new features and bug fixes)

Resolves #103

Types of changes

What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an x in all the boxes that apply:

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds core functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation (update in the documentation)

Checklist

Go over all the following points, and put an x in all the boxes that apply.
If you are unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We are here to help!

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTION guide. (required)
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the tests accordingly. (required for a bug fix or a new feature)
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have reformatted the code using make format. (required)
  • I have checked the code using make lint. (required)
  • I have ensured make test pass. (required)

@XuehaiPan XuehaiPan self-assigned this Oct 8, 2025
@XuehaiPan XuehaiPan added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 8, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 8, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (05691e7) to head (3b2bfa2).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #245   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           14        14           
  Lines         1416      1409    -7     
  Branches       175       174    -1     
=========================================
- Hits          1416      1409    -7     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 100.00% <ø> (ø)
unittests-cp310-Linux 100.00% <ø> (ø)
unittests-cp310-Windows 100.00% <ø> (ø)
unittests-cp310-macOS 100.00% <ø> (ø)
unittests-cp311-Linux 100.00% <ø> (ø)
unittests-cp311-Windows 100.00% <ø> (ø)
unittests-cp311-macOS ?
unittests-cp312-Linux 100.00% <ø> (ø)
unittests-cp312-Windows ?
unittests-cp312-macOS 100.00% <ø> (ø)
unittests-cp313-Linux ?
unittests-cp313-Windows 100.00% <ø> (ø)
unittests-cp313-macOS 100.00% <ø> (ø)
unittests-cp313t-Linux ?
unittests-cp313t-Windows 100.00% <ø> (ø)
unittests-cp313t-macOS ?
unittests-cp314-Linux ?
unittests-cp314-Windows ?
unittests-cp314-macOS ?
unittests-cp314t-Linux ?
unittests-cp314t-Windows ?
unittests-cp314t-macOS ?
unittests-cp39-Linux 100.00% <ø> (ø)
unittests-cp39-Windows 100.00% <ø> (ø)
unittests-cp39-macOS ?
unittests-pp311-Linux 100.00% <ø> (ø)
unittests-pp311-Windows 100.00% <ø> (ø)
unittests-pp311-macOS 100.00% <ø> (ø)
unittests-pydebug ?
unittests-pydebug-cp310d-Linux ?
unittests-pydebug-cp310d-Windows ?
unittests-pydebug-cp310d-macOS ?
unittests-pydebug-cp311d-Linux ?
unittests-pydebug-cp311d-Windows ?
unittests-pydebug-cp311d-macOS ?
unittests-pydebug-cp312d-Linux ?
unittests-pydebug-cp312d-Windows ?
unittests-pydebug-cp312d-macOS ?
unittests-pydebug-cp313d-Linux ?
unittests-pydebug-cp313d-Windows ?
unittests-pydebug-cp313d-macOS ?
unittests-pydebug-cp313td-Linux ?
unittests-pydebug-cp313td-Windows ?
unittests-pydebug-cp313td-macOS ?
unittests-pydebug-cp314d-Linux ?
unittests-pydebug-cp314d-Windows ?
unittests-pydebug-cp314d-macOS ?
unittests-pydebug-cp314td-Linux ?
unittests-pydebug-cp314td-Windows ?
unittests-pydebug-cp314td-macOS ?
unittests-pydebug-cp39d-Linux ?
unittests-pydebug-cp39d-Windows ?
unittests-pydebug-cp39d-macOS ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@XuehaiPan XuehaiPan force-pushed the subinterpreters branch 6 times, most recently from 598799e to 3abad9f Compare October 18, 2025 14:35
@XuehaiPan XuehaiPan force-pushed the subinterpreters branch 4 times, most recently from 7c47834 to a4a95b9 Compare October 27, 2025 04:36
@XuehaiPan XuehaiPan force-pushed the subinterpreters branch 2 times, most recently from d78141a to c389323 Compare November 8, 2025 17:37
@XuehaiPan XuehaiPan modified the milestones: 0.18.0, 0.19.0 Nov 8, 2025
@XuehaiPan XuehaiPan force-pushed the subinterpreters branch 6 times, most recently from b264482 to cd97be5 Compare November 22, 2025 17:40
@XuehaiPan XuehaiPan force-pushed the main branch 2 times, most recently from 52ad667 to c220cda Compare November 23, 2025 11:22
@XuehaiPan XuehaiPan force-pushed the subinterpreters branch 4 times, most recently from 08a40b0 to 0696314 Compare November 29, 2025 12:49
@XuehaiPan XuehaiPan marked this pull request as ready for review December 28, 2025 14:21
@XuehaiPan XuehaiPan requested a review from Copilot December 28, 2025 15:36
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

@XuehaiPan XuehaiPan requested a review from Copilot December 28, 2025 15:57
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 16 out of 16 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.


💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@XuehaiPan XuehaiPan requested a review from Copilot December 28, 2025 16:34
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 16 out of 16 changed files in this pull request and generated 6 comments.


💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@XuehaiPan XuehaiPan removed the test-with-nightly-pybind11 Use nightly pybind11 in tests label Dec 31, 2025
@XuehaiPan XuehaiPan added the test-with-nightly-pybind11 Use nightly pybind11 in tests label Dec 31, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cxx Something related to the CXX source code enhancement New feature or request python Something related to the Python source code test-with-nightly-pybind11 Use nightly pybind11 in tests

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature Request] Subinterpreters Support (PEP 734 & PEP 684)

1 participant