fix(func): reject invalid function names with consecutive hyphens (DNS-1035)

[intojhanurag]

Fixes missing validation for function names containing consecutive hyphens (--).

Kubernetes resource names must follow DNS-1035 rules. Names like test--func
were incorrectly accepted by the func CLI and cause deployment failures.

This change validates function names at creation time and rejects invalid
DNS-1035 names before generating the function.

Before:

After:

[knative-prow]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: intojhanurag
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign dsimansk for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 55.09%. Comparing base (fc761ce) to head (dfca6c8).
⚠️ Report is 63 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3313      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   51.80%   55.09%   +3.28%     
==========================================
  Files         162      170       +8     
  Lines       19132    19854     +722     
==========================================
+ Hits         9912    10938    +1026     
+ Misses       8242     7847     -395     
- Partials      978     1069      +91     

Flag	Coverage Δ
e2e	39.59% <0.00%> (?)
e2e go	35.61% <0.00%> (?)
e2e node	31.13% <0.00%> (?)
e2e python	35.33% <0.00%> (?)
e2e quarkus	31.28% <0.00%> (?)
e2e rust	30.72% <0.00%> (?)
e2e springboot	30.77% <0.00%> (?)
e2e typescript	31.24% <0.00%> (?)
integration	17.45% <0.00%> (-0.43%)	⬇️
unit macos-14	44.97% <100.00%> (+0.59%)	⬆️
unit macos-latest	44.96% <100.00%> (+0.58%)	⬆️
unit ubuntu-24.04-arm	45.08% <100.00%> (+0.51%)	⬆️
unit ubuntu-latest	45.87% <100.00%> (+0.55%)	⬆️
unit windows-latest	44.99% <100.00%> (+0.59%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[intojhanurag]

/retest

[intojhanurag]

Hey @gauron99 , Is it good to go ?

[gauron99]

Hi can you show me what rule does not allow this?

[intojhanurag]

Hey @gauron99, I read about this primarily in a drive created by RayyanSeliya and got to know something similar on stackoverflow.

[gauron99]

well, what is the source? From what I referenced in some previous PR (cant find it now) is something like this https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/overview/working-with-objects/names/#names where only rules i find are

 contain no more than 253 characters
 contain only lowercase alphanumeric characters, '-' or '.'
 start with an alphanumeric character
 end with an alphanumeric character

additionally im able to deploy to KinD cluster a function with -- in middle of the name

[intojhanurag]

Hey you are right , i thought this doc's issues are evaluated and made to resolve in future.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1r3SQXjQiDGraA-kBhwM-y4grxfiQLNRQCi_LanB4sqc/edit?tab=t.0

(btw this issue is mentioned in 3rd point)

[gauron99]

im not sure about the docs, looks like something @RayyanSeliya created. He was working on a lot of CLI related issues with validation and similar.

[intojhanurag]

@gauron99 , Make sense ! (Sorry for your time , i will evaluate from next time)

[RayyanSeliya]

Hey @gauron99 I had created error report in Google docs for each func commands. So yeah I guess this issue I mentioned in that .. and talking about namespace validation we had a talk in this pr #3133 (comment)