Skip to content

Conversation

@Kiarokh
Copy link
Collaborator

@Kiarokh Kiarokh commented Dec 27, 2023

No description provided.

@adrianschmidt

This comment was marked as resolved.

@Kiarokh

This comment was marked as resolved.

@Kiarokh

This comment was marked as outdated.

@adrianschmidt

This comment was marked as outdated.


### Please note

Kompendium is still in development. Consider this an early preview!
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree, but this is very much up to @jgroth to decide.

Also, we might want to bump to v1.0.0 then?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have been using Kompendium forever kind of. So if there has been any show-stopper issues, we would have discovered them.

If we want external help, and also if we want people to actually use Kompendium in their project (to then contribute to it), then including this note is just super bad, strategically.

😅 How would you yourself do, if you came to an open-source project which basically says right in the beginning:

well... you better perhaps not use this package, if you don't want any headaches

Also, Kompendium is amazing as is!

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Again, I completely agree! But it's still up to Johan to make the decision 😊

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah I wrote that for Johan :P

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants