-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 64
fix: prevent premature loop termination for Gemini 3 tool calls #49
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
victorbash400
wants to merge
2
commits into
google:main
Choose a base branch
from
victorbash400:fix/gemini3-loop-v2
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+30
−4
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems to be wrong as it will not break when there is final response but there is no any function response. It can lead to infinity loop as we are using unsafe
while (true)practice.I think we might need to find out another solution for that problem.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the review ,based on my reading of the code, it looks like the loop does break when there is a final response and no function response. In that case,
isFinalResponse(lastEvent)istrueandhasFunctionResponseremainsfalse, so the condition evaluates totrue && trueand exits the loop.Basically this:
The
hasFunctionResponseflag resets tofalseat the start of each iteration. As we process events fromrunOneStepAsync, if we encounter any function responses, we set it totrue. After processing all events, we check whether we received a final response without any function responses. If so, we break. The only case where we continue looping is whenhasFunctionResponseistrue, meaning we just processed a tool response and need to send it back to the model for another turn.Note the
while(true)pattern was already present in the original code:I only modified the break condition, not the loop structure .