-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
fix: expo plugin breaking due to override keyword needing to be public in version 54 #95
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: expo plugin breaking due to override keyword needing to be public in version 54 #95
Conversation
WalkthroughcomputeMethodPrefix now parses only the major SDK version (segment before the first dot) and returns no prefix for major 53, "public override" for majors > 53; tests were updated to use semantic version strings and a new SDK 54 test plus snapshot assertions were added. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Test as Tests
participant Updater as swiftFileUpdater
participant Prefix as computeMethodPrefix
Note over Test,Updater: Test supplies originalContents + sdkVersion
Test->>Updater: call swiftFileUpdater(originalContents, sdkVersion)
Updater->>Prefix: computeMethodPrefix(sdkVersion)
alt sdkVersion missing or malformed
Prefix-->>Updater: ""
else major === 53
Prefix-->>Updater: ""
else major > 53
Prefix-->>Updater: "public override"
end
Updater-->>Test: modified Swift file contents (with selected prefix)
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🧰 Additional context used🧬 Code graph analysis (1)plugin/__tests__/withRNOrientationAppDelegate.spec.ts (3)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
plugin/__tests__/__snapshots__/withRNOrientationAppDelegate.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snap
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
plugin/__tests__/withRNOrientationAppDelegate.spec.ts(1 hunks)plugin/src/withRNOrientationAppDelegate.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
plugin/__tests__/withRNOrientationAppDelegate.spec.ts (3)
plugin/src/withRNOrientationAppDelegate.ts (1)
swiftFileUpdater(58-102)plugin/__tests__/fixtures/AppDelegate52.swift (2)
AppDelegate(6-30)application(8-17)plugin/__tests__/fixtures/AppDelegate53.swift (1)
AppDelegate(5-53)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
plugin/src/withRNOrientationAppDelegate.ts (1)
86-101: The implementation is correct; test case names are misleading but snapshots reflect the correct behavior.The snapshot verification reveals the original review comment misinterpreted the test case names. While the descriptions are backwards:
- SDK 52 test says "having public override" but actually shows NO override (line 100:
func application(...))- SDK 53+ tests say "without override" but actually show "public override" (lines 157, 238:
public override func application(...))The actual snapshot content is correct and matches the implementation logic:
- SDK < 53: empty prefix (no override keyword)
- SDK ≥ 53: "public override" prefix
This correctly addresses the original issue #93 where SDK 54 requires the override keyword.
Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
This PR fixes #93.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Tests