-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Release 0.4.3 #16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Release 0.4.3 #16
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@FOV-RGT has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 11 minutes and 34 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Walkthrough本次 PR 统一并发配置并调整少量工作流与文档:将 secret 名称 Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
.github/workflows/cd-prod.yaml (1)
17-19:DB_URL和BACKEND_HOST_PORT环境变量未被使用
DB_URL和BACKEND_HOST_PORT已定义但在工作流中没有任何引用。BACKEND_CONTAINER_PORT在 build-args 中被正确使用(line 103),但另外两个变量应当被移除或明确其使用意图。如果这些变量预留供未来使用,建议提供相关文档说明;否则建议删除以保持配置简洁。
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
.github/workflows/auto-tag-release.yaml.github/workflows/cd-prod.yaml.github/workflows/ci-cd-dev.yaml.github/workflows/ci-feature.yaml.github/workflows/ci-prod.yaml.github/workflows/ci-release.yaml.github/workflows/pr-check-dev.yaml.github/workflows/pr-check-prod.yaml.github/workflows/release-snapshot.yaml.prettierignoreREADME.mdpackage.jsonscripts/generate-snapshot-info.cjsscripts/validate-release-version.cjs
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/*.{yaml,yml,json}
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)
Use 2 spaces for indentation in YAML and JSON files
Files:
package.json
🧠 Learnings (2)
📚 Learning: 2025-12-22T19:42:55.173Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: gdmuna/nestjs-demo-basic PR: 0
File: .github/copilot-instructions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-22T19:42:55.173Z
Learning: Follow NestJS directory structure convention with src/ containing: common/ (shared services), utils/ (utility functions and constants), feature modules, controllers, services, and main.ts entry point
Applied to files:
package.json
📚 Learning: 2025-12-22T19:42:55.173Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: gdmuna/nestjs-demo-basic PR: 0
File: .github/copilot-instructions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-22T19:42:55.173Z
Learning: Applies to CHANGELOG{,_zh-CN}.md : Maintain CHANGELOG.md (English) and CHANGELOG_zh-CN.md (Chinese) files with detailed records of file changes, config modifications, dependency updates, and renames/deletions
Applied to files:
README.md
🔇 Additional comments (16)
package.json (1)
4-4: 版本升级正确!版本从 0.4.2 升级到 0.4.3,与 PR 标题一致,符合语义化版本规范。
.github/workflows/ci-release.yaml (1)
7-9: 并发控制配置合理!新增的并发控制块使用动态的
github.ref实现了按分支隔离的运行机制,cancel-in-progress: true的设置确保同一分支的新推送会取消正在运行的旧工作流,有效避免重复运行。命名规范清晰,与 PR 目标一致。.github/workflows/ci-cd-dev.yaml (1)
14-16: 并发组命名优化得当!将并发组从静态字符串改为动态的
ci/cd-development-${{ github.ref }},实现了更精细的按分支隔离。这与 PR 中其他工作流的改动保持一致,提升了 CI/CD 流程的可靠性。.github/workflows/ci-feature.yaml (1)
7-9: 特性分支并发控制配置正确!为特性分支工作流添加了并发控制,使用
ci-feature-${{ github.ref }}作为分组标识,cancel-in-progress: true确保同一分支的新提交会取消旧的运行。配置规范且与其他工作流保持一致。.github/workflows/pr-check-prod.yaml (1)
8-10: PR 检查并发控制设计合理!使用
github.event.pull_request.id作为并发组标识符,这对于 PR 触发的工作流是正确的选择,确保每个 PR 的检查相互隔离。cancel-in-progress: true保证了 PR 更新时会取消旧的检查运行,节省资源并加快反馈速度。.prettierignore (1)
1-1: Prettier 配置符合预期!新增
.prettierignore文件将 Markdown 文件排除在格式化之外,配置简洁明确,与 PR 目标一致。.github/workflows/ci-prod.yaml (1)
7-9: 生产环境 CI 并发控制优化到位!将并发组更新为动态的
ci-production-${{ github.ref }},与开发环境和其他工作流的改进保持一致,确保了生产分支的 CI 运行按分支正确隔离。.github/workflows/release-snapshot.yaml (1)
7-9: 快照发布并发控制配置合理!为快照发布工作流添加了并发控制,特别注意到
cancel-in-progress: false的设置。这是正确且有意为之的配置——对于快照发布这类重要的构建任务,不应该取消正在进行的构建,确保每个快照都能完整生成。这体现了对不同工作流场景的细致考虑。.github/workflows/pr-check-dev.yaml (1)
8-10: 并发控制配置正确!为 PR 检查工作流添加并发控制是正确的做法。使用
github.event.pull_request.id作为分组键确保同一 PR 的多次推送只运行最新的工作流,cancel-in-progress: true可以取消正在进行的旧运行,节省 CI 资源。README.md (1)
378-378: 文档更新与代码保持一致!将 Secret 名称从
PAT_TOKEN更新为PAT与工作流文件中的更改保持一致。文档准确性对用户配置至关重要。.github/workflows/auto-tag-release.yaml (2)
11-13: 文档注释更新正确!注释已正确更新为新的 Secret 名称
PAT,与实际使用保持一致,有助于维护者理解配置要求。
25-25: Secret 引用更新正确!环境变量已正确更新为使用
secrets.PAT,并保留了对GITHUB_TOKEN的回退机制。这确保了即使未配置 PAT,工作流也能继续执行(尽管不会触发后续的 CD 流程)。scripts/generate-snapshot-info.cjs (1)
85-89: 代码可重用性改进正确!添加
require.main === module条件判断和导出main函数是标准的 CommonJS 模块模式。这使得脚本既可以直接执行,也可以作为模块导入,提高了代码的可测试性和可重用性。实现正确。scripts/validate-release-version.cjs (1)
127-131: 模块化改造与其他脚本保持一致!此脚本采用了与
generate-snapshot-info.cjs相同的模块化模式,确保了代码库中脚本处理方式的一致性。这种统一的方法提高了可维护性,并使脚本更易于测试。.github/workflows/cd-prod.yaml (2)
22-22: 并发组命名标准化!将并发组名称从
"CD - Production - ${{ github.ref }}"简化为"cd-production-${{ github.ref }}"提高了命名的一致性,与 PR 中其他工作流的命名风格保持一致。
23-23: 验证生产部署的取消策略是否合适。将
cancel-in-progress从false改为true意味着当新的标签被推送时,正在进行的生产部署会被取消。请确认:
- 当前部署流程(Docker 镜像构建和推送)是否可以安全取消而不会留下不一致状态
- 是否存在后续的部署步骤(如数据库迁移、服务重启)可能因取消而导致问题
- 生产环境中是否预期会出现快速连续的标签推送
对于纯粹的 Docker 镜像构建和推送,取消通常是安全的。但如果有状态变更操作,建议保持
cancel-in-progress: false以确保部署完整执行。
|
Note Docstrings generation - SUCCESS |
Docstrings generation was requested by @FOV-RGT. * #16 (comment) The following files were modified: * `scripts/generate-snapshot-info.cjs` * `scripts/validate-release-version.cjs`
📝 Add docstrings to `release-0.4`
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
scripts/validate-release-version.cjs (1)
1-1: 修复 Prettier 格式问题。两个 CI 流水线都报告了 Prettier 格式问题,必须修复才能通过检查。
运行以下命令修复格式:
prettier --write scripts/validate-release-version.cjs
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
scripts/validate-release-version.cjs (1)
54-59: 移除重复的setGitHubOutput函数并从version-utils.cjs导入。该函数已在
version-utils.cjs中定义(第 168-173 行)并导出,其他脚本如validate-version.cjs和create-release-tag.cjs均已正确从该模块导入。请将本文件中第 54-59 行的函数定义删除,改为在文件顶部添加导入语句:const { setGitHubOutput } = require('./version-utils.cjs');
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
scripts/generate-snapshot-info.cjsscripts/validate-release-version.cjs
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- scripts/generate-snapshot-info.cjs
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: CR
Repo: gdmuna/nestjs-demo-basic PR: 0
File: .github/copilot-instructions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-22T19:42:55.173Z
Learning: Follow Conventional Commits format for commit messages: <type>(<scope>): <subject> with types: feat, fix, docs, style, refactor, perf, test, chore, ci, build, release, revert
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
scripts/validate-release-version.cjs (3)
scripts/validate-version.cjs (1)
require(10-10)scripts/create-release-tag.cjs (1)
require(12-12)scripts/version-utils.cjs (1)
require(9-9)
🪛 GitHub Actions: CI - Release Branch
scripts/validate-release-version.cjs
[warning] 1-1: Code style issues found in this file. Run Prettier with --write to fix.
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull Request Check - Production
scripts/validate-release-version.cjs
[warning] 1-1: Prettier formatting issues detected in this file. Run 'prettier --write' to fix.
🔇 Additional comments (2)
scripts/validate-release-version.cjs (2)
61-67: 优秀的文档补充!JSDoc 注释清晰地说明了函数的用途、环境变量依赖、输出和退出码,提升了代码可维护性。
133-137: 实现方式正确!使用
require.main === module保护和导出main函数是标准的 Node.js 模式,允许脚本既可以直接运行也可以作为模块导入,与 PR 目标一致。
… inline definition to import from 'version-utils.cjs'
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
scripts/validate-release-version.cjs (1)
54-59: 建议使用共享的工具函数以消除重复代码
setGitHubOutput函数在此处定义,但根据相关代码片段显示,version-utils.cjs已经导出了相同的工具函数,并被其他脚本(如validate-version.cjs和create-release-tag.cjs)引用使用。建议从
version-utils.cjs导入该函数以遵循 DRY 原则,提高代码的可维护性和一致性。🔎 建议的重构方案
在文件顶部添加导入:
const fs = require('fs'); const path = require('path'); +const { setGitHubOutput } = require('./version-utils.cjs');然后移除本地定义的
setGitHubOutput函数(第 54-59 行):-// 设置 GitHub Actions 输出 -function setGitHubOutput(key, value) { - const outputFile = process.env.GITHUB_OUTPUT; - if (outputFile) { - fs.appendFileSync(outputFile, `${key}=${value}\n`, 'utf8'); - } -} -
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
scripts/generate-snapshot-info.cjsscripts/validate-release-version.cjs
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- scripts/generate-snapshot-info.cjs
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
scripts/validate-release-version.cjs (3)
scripts/create-release-tag.cjs (1)
require(12-12)scripts/validate-version.cjs (1)
require(10-10)scripts/version-utils.cjs (1)
require(9-9)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
scripts/validate-release-version.cjs (1)
61-67: 文档说明清晰完整!添加的函数文档详细说明了
main函数的行为、环境变量依赖、输出和退出码,提升了代码的可维护性。
| if (require.main === module) { | ||
| main(); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| module.exports = { main }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
模块化模式正确,但 process.exit() 限制了可复用性
条件执行守卫和模块导出的实现符合 Node.js 最佳实践,使脚本既可以直接运行也可以作为模块导入。
但存在一个重要问题:main() 函数内部多次调用 process.exit()(第 108、122、129 行),当其他模块导入并调用 main() 时,会直接终止整个 Node.js 进程。这限制了该函数作为模块的实际可用性。
建议考虑以下改进方案之一:
- 返回结果对象而不是调用
process.exit() - 抛出错误而不是
process.exit(1) - 在文档中明确说明此限制
🔎 可选的重构方案示例
如果希望真正实现模块化复用,可以重构为:
function main() {
try {
// ... 验证逻辑 ...
if (isValid) {
console.log('✅ 版本验证通过');
// ... 设置输出 ...
console.log('========================================');
- process.exit(0);
+ return { success: true, isValid: true, expectedVersionPrefix, actualVersion };
} else {
console.log('❌ 版本验证失败');
// ... 设置输出和错误消息 ...
console.error(messageCn);
console.log('========================================');
- process.exit(1);
+ return { success: false, isValid: false, expectedVersionPrefix, actualVersion, error: messageCn };
}
} catch (error) {
console.error('❌ 错误:', error.message);
setGitHubOutput('is_valid', 'false');
// ...
- process.exit(1);
+ return { success: false, isValid: false, error: error.message };
}
}
if (require.main === module) {
- main();
+ const result = main();
+ process.exit(result.success ? 0 : 1);
}这样既保持了作为独立脚本运行时的退出码行为,又允许作为模块导入时获取结构化的返回结果。
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In scripts/validate-release-version.cjs around lines 133 to 137, the module
guard and export are fine but main() currently calls process.exit() at lines
108, 122 and 129 which terminates the whole Node process when imported; refactor
main() to stop calling process.exit() internally and instead return a structured
result object (or throw errors) indicating success/failure and exit code; update
the CLI branch (the require.main === module block) to call main() and call
process.exit(result.code) or handle thrown errors there so running as a script
preserves exit semantics while importing the module remains reusable.
|
✅ Package 版本检查通过
版本配置正确,可以合并。 ✅ Package Version Check Passed
Version is correctly configured for this release. |
This pull request primarily improves CI/CD workflow reliability and maintainability by standardizing concurrency settings across all GitHub Actions workflows, updating secret naming conventions, and making minor code quality improvements.
Workflow concurrency and naming standardization:
concurrencygroups for all workflows to ensure only one workflow per branch or pull request runs at a time, using consistent and descriptive group names (e.g.,ci-feature-${{ github.ref }}), and enabledcancel-in-progresswhere appropriate to avoid redundant runs. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]Secret and environment variable updates:
PAT_TOKENtoPATin workflow files and documentation, and updated the corresponding environment variable usage. [1] [2] [3]Code quality and maintainability:
*.mdto.prettierignoreto prevent Prettier from formatting Markdown files.generate-snapshot-info.cjsandvalidate-release-version.cjs) to allow them to be imported as modules in addition to being run as standalone scripts. [1] [2]Other workflow improvements:
These changes help prevent duplicate workflow runs, make secret management clearer, and improve code reusability and formatting consistency.
Summary by CodeRabbit
版本更新
文档更新
Chores
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.