Skip to content

Conversation

@amityadav0
Copy link
Contributor

Description

  • Add support for perpetual messages

What has Changed?

What specific problem were you aiming to address, and how did you successfully resolve it? If tests were not uploaded for this pull request or if coverage decreased, please provide an explanation for the change.


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • added ! to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • followed the guidelines for building modules
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • included comments for documenting Go code
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic
  • reviewed API design and naming
  • reviewed documentation is accurate
  • reviewed tests and test coverage
  • manually tested (if applicable)

Deployment Notes

Are there any specific considerations to take into account when deploying these changes? This may include new dependencies, scripts that need to be executed, or any aspects that can only be evaluated in a deployed environment.

Screenshots and Videos

Please provide any relevant before and after screenshots by uploading them here. Additionally, demo videos can be highly beneficial in demonstrating the process.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 22, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 25.20325% with 92 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 56.81%. Comparing base (b75b005) to head (b883478).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           vaults    #1390      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   56.91%   56.81%   -0.10%     
==========================================
  Files         974      974              
  Lines       41705    41826     +121     
==========================================
+ Hits        23737    23765      +28     
- Misses      16333    16424      +91     
- Partials     1635     1637       +2     
Components Coverage Δ
leveragelp_transactions 81.00% <ø> (ø)
leveragelp_lifecycle 85.93% <ø> (ø)
leveragelp_keeper 85.10% <ø> (ø)
leveragelp_queries 19.61% <ø> (ø)
accountedpool_transactions 100.00% <ø> (ø)
accountedpool_lifecycle 100.00% <ø> (ø)
accountedpool_queries 81.25% <ø> (ø)
amm_transactions 72.86% <ø> (ø)
amm_lifecycle 88.02% <ø> (ø)
amm_keeper 72.09% <ø> (ø)
amm_queries 57.43% <ø> (ø)
assetprofile_transactions 76.85% <ø> (ø)
assetprofile_lifecycle ∅ <ø> (∅)
assetprofile_keeper 80.00% <ø> (ø)
assetprofile_queries 60.00% <ø> (ø)
burner_transactions 13.33% <ø> (ø)
burner_lifecycle ∅ <ø> (∅)
burner_keeper 100.00% <ø> (ø)
burner_queries 78.57% <ø> (ø)
commitment_transactions 74.49% <ø> (ø)
commitment_lifecycle ∅ <ø> (∅)
commitment_keeper 80.97% <ø> (ø)
commitment_queries 43.97% <ø> (ø)
epochs_transactions ∅ <ø> (∅)
epochs_lifecycle 92.00% <ø> (ø)
epochs_keeper 84.61% <ø> (ø)
epochs_queries 83.33% <ø> (ø)
estaking_transactions 56.33% <ø> (ø)
estaking_lifecycle 87.93% <ø> (ø)
estaking_keeper 67.79% <ø> (ø)
estaking_queries 66.90% <ø> (ø)
incentive_transactions ∅ <ø> (∅)
incentive_lifecycle ∅ <ø> (∅)
incentive_keeper ∅ <ø> (∅)
incentive_queries ∅ <ø> (∅)
masterchef_transactions 85.40% <ø> (ø)
masterchef_lifecycle 72.32% <ø> (ø)
masterchef_keeper 100.00% <ø> (ø)
masterchef_queries 42.74% <ø> (ø)
oracle_transactions 0.00% <ø> (ø)
oracle_lifecycle 0.00% <ø> (ø)
oracle_keeper 58.33% <ø> (ø)
oracle_queries ∅ <ø> (∅)
parameter_transactions 15.38% <ø> (ø)
parameter_lifecycle ∅ <ø> (∅)
parameter_keeper 75.00% <ø> (ø)
parameter_queries 57.14% <ø> (ø)
stablestake_transactions 80.18% <ø> (ø)
stablestake_lifecycle 100.00% <ø> (ø)
stablestake_keeper 92.00% <ø> (ø)
stablestake_queries 90.90% <ø> (ø)
perpetual_transactions 77.58% <100.00%> (+0.07%) ⬆️
perpetual_lifecycle 84.00% <ø> (ø)
perpetual_keeper 62.63% <ø> (ø)
perpetual_queries 59.50% <ø> (ø)
tier_transactions 100.00% <ø> (ø)
tier_lifecycle 100.00% <ø> (ø)
tier_keeper 90.90% <ø> (ø)
tier_queries 74.48% <ø> (ø)
tokenomics_transactions 71.87% <ø> (ø)
tokenomics_lifecycle ∅ <ø> (∅)
tokenomics_keeper 80.00% <ø> (ø)
tokenomics_queries 79.06% <ø> (ø)
tradeshield_transactions 80.80% <ø> (ø)
tradeshield_lifecycle ∅ <ø> (∅)
tradeshield_keeper 90.90% <ø> (ø)
tradeshield_queries 67.56% <ø> (ø)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Base automatically changed from vaults to main July 31, 2025 13:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants