Skip to content

Conversation

@yetanothertw
Copy link
Contributor

@yetanothertw yetanothertw commented Dec 30, 2025

Summary

Part of #4117, Shaina and I have come across this snippet while simplifying the tags and were wondering whether this admonition can be simplified, or if the tags can be removed altogether, so that the admonition inherits the context of the page (given that autoops is now available everywhere).

Generative AI disclosure

  1. Did you use a generative AI (GenAI) tool to assist in creating this contribution?
  • Yes
  • No

Part of #4117, Shaina and I have come across this snippet while simplifying the tags and were wondering whether this admonition can be simplified, or if the tags can be removed altogether, so that the admonition inherits the context of the page (given that autoops is now available everywhere).
@yetanothertw yetanothertw requested a review from a team as a code owner December 30, 2025 10:31
@yetanothertw yetanothertw self-assigned this Dec 30, 2025
@yetanothertw yetanothertw added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation Team:Admin Issues owned by the Admin Docs Team labels Dec 30, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

✅ Vale Linting Results

No issues found on modified lines!

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
:::{admonition} Simplify monitoring with AutoOps
:applies_to: { ess:, ece:, eck:, self:, "serverless": "ga" }
:applies_to: { "stack": "ga", "serverless": "ga" }
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As per @shainaraskas's comment , perhaps this suggestion is more suited?

Suggested change
:applies_to: { "stack": "ga", "serverless": "ga" }

@yetanothertw yetanothertw mentioned this pull request Dec 30, 2025
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation Team:Admin Issues owned by the Admin Docs Team

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants