Fix for transition precedence no longer given to substates #626
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR addresses issue #624, in which a breaking change in v5.18.0 caused asynchronous substate transitions to be ignored when a viable parent state transition is configured. These changes are intended to restore the transition precedence from prior releases.
Fixed the trigger handler selection logic in
StateRepresentation.Async.csso that substate (local) transitions are preferred over superstate transitions in async scenarios. This ensures correct transition precedence when both substate and superstate can handle the same trigger.Added new tests in
TransitionFixture.csto verify that substate transitions correctly override superstate transitions for both synchronous and asynchronous trigger firing.Improved test naming and clarity in
TransitionFixture.csfor reentry and transition tests, making the intent of each test clearer.