Added a test for Issue #1127

[sei-vsarvepalli]

Basic test case for Issue #1127 already resolved in last PR #1128 as requested in #1129

This is entirely optional test case to ensure we have reliable test cases for this issue that was raised by @dmitrc

[davidlehn]

• I think this is probably better in tests/unit/pkcs12.js with the other related tests? Maybe with a comment it was for issue 1127.
• Remove the async. Not needed here and it breaks the silly check we have for node 6(!).

[sei-vsarvepalli]

• I think this is probably better in tests/unit/pkcs12.js with the other related tests? Maybe with a comment it was for issue 1127.
• Remove the async. Not needed here and it breaks the silly check we have for node 6(!).

Updated the test as requested by David Lehn.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 80.18%. Comparing base (194988d) to head (fd07474).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1131      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   80.20%   80.18%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          42       42              
  Lines        9575     9575              
==========================================
- Hits         7680     7678       -2     
- Misses       1895     1897       +2     

see 2 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 194988d...fd07474. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.