Skip to content

Conversation

@khoroshevskyi
Copy link
Member

Changes:

  • Added UMAP embedding of the file
  • Added 2D UMAP visualization
  • Added BED analyzer to bedbase

TODO:

  • Version of pepdbagent updated in __version__.py file
  • Changelog updated

khoroshevskyi and others added 30 commits October 16, 2025 14:23
Bumps [vite](https://github.com/vitejs/vite/tree/HEAD/packages/vite) from 6.3.6 to 6.4.1.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/vitejs/vite/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/vitejs/vite/blob/main/packages/vite/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](https://github.com/vitejs/vite/commits/create-vite@6.4.1/packages/vite)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: vite
  dependency-version: 6.4.1
  dependency-type: direct:development
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@sanghoonio
Copy link
Member

ui feedback and bugs

umap page:

  • hover prevents tooltip focus
  • summary figures on the right for given selection?
  • deselect button from selection table
  • show neighbors option for upload bed file

bed2bed search

  • locate button should be on umap instead of search bar
  • umap should have full width option

homepage:

  • umap preview should either make main umap page easier to access (/umap redirect button?), or be replaced with a screenshot/graphic

@khoroshevskyi
Copy link
Member Author

I was consulting with a few people who don’t know what Bedbase is, and these were their comments:

  • Landing page

    • The text is too small and hard to read, and eyes are getting tired faster.
    • There are several fields (code), but no explanation of what they mean, so they didn’t know what to do with them. They prefer more text with visualization then compact fields
    • The UMAP on the front page was confusing — they didn’t know how to use it. They suggested having it as a link with a short description instead.
    • The top navbar text is too small. People preferred having icons so they don’t need to read as much.
  • Bed page

    • Metadata appears in two places (left and right) and isn’t organized in columns, which is harder to navigate by eye.
    • The text is too small, and there’s too much white space
    • Since we can many items, they suggested using a table layout.
    • For lists of bedsets and similar files, a table layout is also better — it makes it easier to compare elements.(e.g. if all elements are chip-seq, or atac-seq). Looking at each file individually makes comparison harder.
  • Search

    • Same as before: text is too small, metadata isn’t shown in a table way, and comparing items takes more time.
    • The UMAP in Bed-to-Bed search is nice, but people were confused why UMAP appears in two different places.

Because of this comments I will close this PR for now. I will leave main elements, that were added here, and move all code to new ui branch, for later discussion.

@khoroshevskyi khoroshevskyi deleted the dev branch December 1, 2025 23:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants