Public review draft tech arch vision #3
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Added a link to the Cornerstone Technical Architecture Vision document.
…ge emphasis words to be consistent with emphasizing key words and not ideas. Fix heading above fig 4 to read more like a heading. Make vision unlocks structure more consistent by updating the bullet names and structure.
…for when used as subheaders
Tech arch vision draft - internal review
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR serves as a public review of the Technical Architecture Vision paper. View the draft vision in a legible format.
To comment on specific line:
Look under Files changed and the Cornerstone_Architecture_Vision.md and then click the
+symbol on the line of your choice to add a comment.For general comments, just add them below.