Skip to content

Conversation

@f3l1x
Copy link
Member

@f3l1x f3l1x commented Nov 25, 2025

  • Add clear "What is Apitte Skeleton?" introduction explaining the project purpose
  • Add "Why use this skeleton?" section highlighting key benefits
  • Create "Quick Start (5 minutes)" section for fastest setup path
  • Reorganize installation steps into clear numbered sections
  • Add API Endpoints reference table for quick overview
  • Add example curl commands for creating users
  • Simplify project structure diagram with helpful descriptions
  • Add Tech Stack summary table
  • Add Useful Commands reference
  • Add "Need Help?" section with support links
  • Remove detailed package list in favor of concise tech stack table
  • Overall more welcoming and scannable for first-time users

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Clarified project purpose and feature overview
    • Streamlined quick-start guide with step-by-step setup instructions
    • Enhanced API documentation with endpoint examples and cURL commands
    • Added guidance for integrating API documentation UI tools
    • Reorganized project structure and technology stack information
    • Updated development commands reference

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

- Add clear "What is Apitte Skeleton?" introduction explaining the project purpose
- Add "Why use this skeleton?" section highlighting key benefits
- Create "Quick Start (5 minutes)" section for fastest setup path
- Reorganize installation steps into clear numbered sections
- Add API Endpoints reference table for quick overview
- Add example curl commands for creating users
- Simplify project structure diagram with helpful descriptions
- Add Tech Stack summary table
- Add Useful Commands reference
- Add "Need Help?" section with support links
- Remove detailed package list in favor of concise tech stack table
- Overall more welcoming and scannable for first-time users
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 25, 2025

Walkthrough

README.md has been comprehensively restructured, shifting from a Docker-centric quick-start focus to a batteries-included REST API foundation narrative. The update emphasizes OpenAPI-centered API usage, includes explicit Quick Start instructions for Docker and manual setups, and consolidates guidance across setup, API documentation, and project structure.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation restructuring
README.md
Replaces "Goal" section with "What is Apitte Skeleton?"; rewrites setup flow emphasizing Docker Compose; adds comprehensive Quick Start for both Docker and manual installations; expands API documentation with endpoints table and cURL examples; introduces "Adding API Documentation UI" section; reorganizes Project Structure and Tech Stack; consolidates "Useful Commands"; improves contributor guidance and wording throughout.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

  • Documentation-only update with no code logic to verify
  • Homogeneous changes (single file, consistent pattern of reorganization and copywriting)
  • Primary effort is confirming content accuracy, clarity, and consistency of instructions
  • May benefit from sanity-checking that Quick Start commands are correct and reflect actual project setup

Poem

🐰 The README now hops with clearer paths,
Quick starts and Docker, no aftermath,
API docs shine with OpenAPI's glow,
A batteries-packed skeleton ready to show!

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately reflects the main objective of the PR, which is improving documentation to make it more accessible for newcomers through reorganization, quick-start guides, and clearer structure.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch claude/improve-readme-docs-016omPFMq6fJbv7cs6Q5gJcA

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 19662645700

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 12.621%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 19627676502: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 26
Relevant Lines: 206

💛 - Coveralls

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
README.md (4)

45-45: Wrap bare URLs in link syntax to comply with MD034.

Lines 45 and 151 contain bare URLs that should be wrapped in Markdown link syntax for consistency and to pass linting checks.

Apply this diff to fix both occurrences:

- Try it yourself: https://examples.contributte.org/apitte-skeleton/
+ Try it yourself: [https://examples.contributte.org/apitte-skeleton/](https://examples.contributte.org/apitte-skeleton/)

And:

- Open http://localhost:8000 and you're ready to go!
+ Open [http://localhost:8000](http://localhost:8000) and you're ready to go!

Also applies to: 151-151


95-95: Use heading syntax instead of emphasis for subsection labels (MD036).

Lines 95 and 103 use emphasis (**...**) for subsection labels, but should use heading syntax (###) to improve document structure and pass linting.

Apply this diff to fix both:

- **Option A: PostgreSQL**
+ ### Option A: PostgreSQL

- **Option B: MariaDB**
+ ### Option B: MariaDB

Also applies to: 103-103


189-189: Specify language for code block to enable syntax highlighting (MD040).

The project structure code block is missing a language identifier, which affects readability and fails linting.

Apply this diff:

- ```
+ ```text
  apitte-skeleton/

267-267: Add alt text to author avatar image for accessibility (MD045).

The contributor avatar image is missing alt text, which is an accessibility concern and a linting violation.

Apply this diff:

- <img width="80" height="80" src="https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/538058?v=3&s=80">
+ <img width="80" height="80" src="https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/538058?v=3&s=80" alt="f3l1x GitHub avatar">
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0f08523 and 2cf57ea.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
README.md

45-45: Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


95-95: Emphasis used instead of a heading

(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)


103-103: Emphasis used instead of a heading

(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)


151-151: Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


189-189: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


267-267: Images should have alternate text (alt text)

(MD045, no-alt-text)

🔇 Additional comments (3)
README.md (3)

27-79: Excellent restructuring that makes the project much more accessible to newcomers.

The introduction is welcoming, the Quick Start is clear and actionable, and the progression from Docker-based setup through to trying first requests is well-designed. The examples use realistic API calls and the "batteries included" framing clearly communicates the value proposition. Well done.


81-185: Manual Installation and API Endpoints sections are well-structured and practical.

The step-by-step instructions are clear, the database configuration examples are helpful, and the endpoint table with curl examples provides good reference material. One minor note: the _access_token=admin used in examples is a demo credential—consider adding a brief note clarifying that this is for development/demo only.


187-259: Project Structure, Tech Stack, and support sections are excellent additions.

The directory layout explanation is clear with helpful descriptions, the tech stack table is concise without being overwhelming, and the "Need Help?" section effectively directs newcomers to resources. The Useful Commands reference is practical and saves time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants