-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
feat: allow using an array of selectors for selection functions #69
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: allow using an array of selectors for selection functions #69
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes update the method signatures in the Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Tip ⚡🧪 Multi-step agentic review comment chat (experimental)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/Component.ts(4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/Component.ts (1)
63-99:Details
❓ Verification inconclusive
Great feature addition with consistent implementation.
All four methods (
select,selectAll,closest, andis) have been consistently updated to support multiple selectors, which is a valuable usability improvement. The implementation is correct and aligns with CSS selector group syntax.While not critical, consider adding tests to verify both backward compatibility (single selector) and the new functionality (multiple selectors). This would help ensure the feature works as expected across various use cases.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if there are any existing tests for these methods grep -r "select(" --include="*.test.ts" --include="*.spec.ts" . grep -r "selectAll(" --include="*.test.ts" --include="*.spec.ts" . grep -r "closest(" --include="*.test.ts" --include="*.spec.ts" . grep -r "is(" --include="*.test.ts" --include="*.spec.ts" .Length of output: 263
Subject: Verification of Test Coverage for Multi-Selector Methods
The updated implementations in
src/Component.ts(lines 63–99) for theselect,selectAll,closest, andismethods correctly support multiple selectors and adhere to CSS group selector conventions. However, our search did not reveal any test cases for these methods in the repository. Although this isn’t critical, it would be beneficial to add tests that confirm both the backward compatibility (using a single selector) and the new multi-selector functionality across various scenarios.
- Implementation: Methods are consistently updated and correctly map to CSS selector behaviours.
- Test Coverage: No test cases were located in files matching
*.test.ts/*.spec.ts. Please ensure tests are added to cover:
- Single selector queries.
- Multiple selector queries.
- Edge cases where no elements are found.
Please consider adding these tests to guarantee the feature works as expected.
No description provided.