Made some subfilters' lookup branchless #42
Merged
+926
−649
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
An automated preview of the documentation is available at https://42.bloom.prtest3.cppalliance.org/libs/bloom/doc/html/index.html |
joaquintides
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Made lookup implementation branchless for
block,fast_multiblock32andfast_multiblock64, which results in some performance gains, particularly for mixed successful/unsuccessful queries.Benchmark results
https://github.com/boostorg/boost_bloom_benchmarks/tree/branchful-vs-branchless-comparison
In addition to branchful/branchless, we have also tested with prefetch omission, but results there are inconclusive.