Skip to content

Conversation

@AndrewHanasiro
Copy link
Member

@AndrewHanasiro AndrewHanasiro commented Dec 10, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Integrated official Firebase SDK for push notifications.
  • Improvements

    • Upgraded Go runtime and modernized dependencies.
    • Hardened container image: multi-stage build, non-root user, WORKDIR set, updated base images, and exposed port 5001.
    • CI workflows updated to newer action versions and Go tooling.
  • Tests

    • Unit tests updated to handle constructor error returns and some tests marked to skip.
  • Documentation

    • Removed test coverage badge from README.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 10, 2025

Walkthrough

Bumps Go to 1.24, upgrades many dependencies, converts Dockerfile to a multi-stage non-root image exposing port 5001, refactors Firebase provider to use firebase.App and Messaging with error returns, updates main and tests to handle constructor errors, and upgrades CI workflows and README badge removal.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Docker & deployment
Dockerfile
Converted to multi-stage build; builder base → golang:1.24-alpine; final stage → alpine:3.23.0; copies built http_server and kafka_server via COPY --from=builder; sets WORKDIR /app; creates and switches to a nonroot user; EXPOSE 5001.
Go toolchain & deps
go.mod
Module Go version → 1.24.0; removed toolchain directive; large set of direct and indirect dependency upgrades and additions (including firebase.google.com/go/v4, Gin, OpenTelemetry, gRPC/protobuf, Google Cloud libs, and others).
Firebase provider & initialization
internal/providers/firebase.provider.go
internal/main.go
test/unit/providers/firebase_test.go
NewFirebase signature → (*Firebase, error); provider stores app *firebase.App instead of *http.Client; SendPN now uses Firebase Messaging (messaging.Message and client.Send) and propagates errors; main.go updated to check and log fatal on init error; unit tests updated to handle the error and now skip execution.
CI & docs
.github/workflows/continuous_integration.yml
.github/workflows/manual_deploy.yml
README.md
GitHub Actions upgraded (e.g., actions/checkout → v6, actions/setup-go → v6); go-version1.24.0; SonarCloud action updated; Code Climate scan removed; README test-coverage badge removed.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    autonumber
    actor App as Application / main
    participant Provider as Firebase Provider
    participant SDK as firebase.App & Messaging SDK
    participant FCM as Firebase Cloud Messaging

    App->>Provider: NewFirebase(ctx, credsFile)
    Provider->>SDK: firebase.NewApp(ctx, optsWithCreds)
    SDK-->>Provider: *firebase.App or error
    Provider-->>App: (*Firebase, error)

    alt success
        App->>Provider: SendPN(ctx, token, data)
        Provider->>SDK: app.Messaging(ctx) -> Messaging client
        Provider->>FCM: client.Send(ctx, messaging.Message{Token, Data})
        FCM-->>Provider: messageID / error
        Provider-->>App: return messageID or error
    else failure
        Provider-->>App: return init/send error
    end
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~50 minutes

  • Focus areas:
    • internal/providers/firebase.provider.go — credential loading, firebase.App lifecycle, messaging client usage, and error propagation.
    • internal/main.go — initialization error handling and application startup effects.
    • go.mod — compatibility checks for upgraded gRPC/protobuf and major transitive changes.
    • Dockerfile — binary copy paths, file permissions, and nonroot user correctness.
    • CI workflows — updated action versions and SonarCloud configuration.

Poem

🐰 I hopped through modules, tidy and spry,
Swapped raw HTTP for SDK sky-high,
Built in stages, safer and neat,
Go 1.24 makes my paws quick and fleet,
Errors caught now — I nibble a treat 🥕✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The pull request has no description provided by the author, failing to meet the required template with Proposal and Links sections. Add a description following the template with: Proposal section explaining the purpose of upgrading Go version, dependencies, Dockerfile, and Firebase SDK migration; Links section with relevant issues or documentation.
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'feat: update' is vague and generic, using a non-descriptive term 'update' that fails to convey meaningful information about the substantial changes made. Replace with a specific title that reflects the main changes, such as 'feat: upgrade Go to 1.24 and modernize dependencies' or 'feat: migrate Firebase SDK and update CI workflows'.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch feature/update

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
Dockerfile (1)

16-24: Security hardening looks good, but missing CMD/ENTRYPOINT.

The nonroot user setup is a good security practice. However, the Dockerfile lacks a CMD or ENTRYPOINT instruction, so the container won't know which binary to execute on startup.

 USER nonroot
 EXPOSE 5001
+CMD ["./http_server"]
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
internal/providers/firebase.provider.go (2)

38-44: Consider using Notification field for automatic display.

Using the Data map requires the client app to manually handle and display the notification. For standard push notifications that should appear automatically in the system tray, use the Notification field instead or in addition to Data.

 	message := &messaging.Message{
-		Data: map[string]string{
-			"Title": title,
-			"Body":  content,
-		},
-		Token: deviceID,
+		Notification: &messaging.Notification{
+			Title: title,
+			Body:  content,
+		},
+		Token: deviceID,
 	}

25-25: Hardcoded credentials file path reduces deployment flexibility.

Consider making the credentials path configurable via environment variable or config to support different deployment environments.

+import "os"
+
+func getCredentialsPath() string {
+	if path := os.Getenv("FIREBASE_CREDENTIALS_PATH"); path != "" {
+		return path
+	}
+	return "./service-account-file.json"
+}
+
 func NewFirebase() (*Firebase, error) {
 	instance := new(Firebase)
-	opt := option.WithCredentialsFile("./service-account-file.json")
+	opt := option.WithCredentialsFile(getCredentialsPath())
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ffd9a88 and 8f073de.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • README.md (0 hunks)
  • go.mod (1 hunks)
  • internal/main.go (2 hunks)
  • internal/providers/firebase.provider.go (1 hunks)
  • test/unit/providers/firebase_test.go (2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • README.md
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (3)
internal/main.go (1)
internal/providers/firebase.provider.go (1)
  • NewFirebase (23-33)
internal/providers/firebase.provider.go (1)
config/logger.go (1)
  • GetLogger (11-17)
test/unit/providers/firebase_test.go (1)
internal/providers/firebase.provider.go (1)
  • NewFirebase (23-33)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: Test
  • GitHub Check: Build
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (4)
go.mod (2)

6-20: Dependency updates look reasonable.

The modernization of direct dependencies including Firebase v4.18.0, OpenTelemetry v1.39.0, and others aligns with the Firebase SDK refactoring. Ensure go.sum is updated and tests pass with the new versions.


3-3: > Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.

test/unit/providers/firebase_test.go (1)

30-42: Gock mocks may not intercept Firebase SDK calls.

The Firebase SDK (v4) uses gRPC and the Admin SDK internally, which may not be intercepted by gock HTTP mocks. The NewFirebase() function reads credentials from a file (./service-account-file.json), so these tests will likely fail in CI without that file present. Consider using dependency injection or mocking the Firebase App to make these tests more reliable.

internal/providers/firebase.provider.go (1)

50-54: Good: Direct error propagation from SDK.

The simplified error handling using the SDK's native error is cleaner than the previous manual HTTP response parsing.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8f073de and e6eaca8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/continuous_integration.yml (3 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/continuous_integration.yml (3)

50-50: Clarify the removal of Code Climate Scan step.

The Code Climate Scan step (previously present in the Test job) has been removed. The summary mentions removal but doesn't explain the rationale. Please clarify whether this is:

  • An intentional deprecation of Code Climate coverage tracking
  • A temporary removal that will be re-added
  • A cost/dependency simplification

This change affects code quality metrics visibility in the PR workflow.


33-35: No action needed — Go 1.24.0 is a stable, supported release.

Go 1.24.0 was released on February 11, 2025, and is part of the stable 1.24 release series. The upgrade from 1.23.1 to 1.24.0 is safe and uses a well-established version.

Also applies to: 71-73


33-33: Confirm actions/setup-go@v6 compatibility with current workflow.

Breaking changes exist in v6: toolchain handling has been improved, Node.js runtime upgraded from Node 20 to Node 24, and runner version v2.327.1+ is required. Your workflow explicitly pins Go to 1.24.0 and uses ubuntu-latest runners, which should satisfy these requirements. No action needed unless you experience version resolution issues.

steps:
- name: Checkout repo
uses: actions/checkout@v4
uses: actions/checkout@v6
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

🧩 Analysis chain

🌐 Web query:

actions/checkout v6 breaking changes compared to v4

💡 Result:

Short summary — main breaking changes in actions/checkout@v6 vs v4:

  • persist-credentials behavior changed: credentials are no longer written directly into .git/config; they are stored in a separate file under $RUNNER_TEMP. This affects any workflow that relied on the token being present in the repo’s git config. [1][2]

  • Docker/container workflow note: running authenticated git commands from inside a Docker container action now requires a newer Actions Runner (minimum v2.329.0) to access the persisted credentials. If your runners are older, container-based authenticated git commands may fail. [1][2]

  • Runtime / runner compatibility: newer releases (v5→v6) moved action runtimes (node24) and introduced minimum runner versions for compatibility; while v6 itself emphasizes the credential change, you should confirm your self-hosted/enterprise runner versions when upgrading from v4. [1][3]

  • No other workflow changes required for normal checkout/fetch/push semantics — fetch-depth, ref, repository, token, etc. remain supported, but some edge cases around credential location and Git/runner version (Git behavior changes on runners) may require adjustments. [1][4]

Sources:
[1] actions/checkout README (v6 notes).
[2] GitHub Marketplace checkout listing (v6 release notes).
[3] actions/checkout commit updating refs to v6.
[4] Community/issue reports re: git/runner interactions with checkout v4/v6.


🌐 Web query:

actions/checkout v6 fetch-depth parameter support

💡 Result:

Yes — actions/checkout@v6 supports the fetch-depth input. Default is 1 (single commit); set fetch-depth: 0 to fetch full history (or any integer >1 to fetch that many commits). [1][2]

Sources:

  • actions/checkout README (inputs & examples). [1]
  • GitHub Marketplace checkout v6 notes (examples showing fetch-depth). [2]

Review the persist-credentials behavior change in actions/checkout@v6.

The upgrade from v4 to v6 introduces a breaking change: credentials are no longer written directly into .git/config but instead stored in a separate file under $RUNNER_TEMP. This affects workflows that rely on the token being present in the repo's git config. The fetch-depth: 0 setting on line 31 remains fully supported with no changes. However, if using container-based authenticated git commands, confirm your runners are at least v2.329.0 to access the persisted credentials.

Also applies to: 59-59, 69-69

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
.github/workflows/continuous_integration.yml lines 29 (and also check lines 59
and 69): upgrading actions/checkout@v4→@v6 changes persist-credentials behavior
so tokens are no longer written to .git/config but stored under $RUNNER_TEMP;
update the workflow to explicitly set persist-credentials: true or false as
appropriate and/or adjust any steps that expect credentials in .git/config to
instead read credentials from the RUNNER_TEMP location or use the checkout
action output; if you need container-based authenticated git commands, ensure
the runner version is >= v2.329.0 and document this requirement in the workflow
comments.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
internal/providers/firebase.provider.go (2)

21-32: Avoid hard‑coded credentials path; prefer configuration or dependency injection

NewFirebase currently hard‑codes ./service-account-file.json and creates the firebase.App directly. This couples runtime behavior to the working directory and makes tests/other environments harder to control.

Consider taking the credentials path (or the option.ClientOption) from configuration and/or accepting a prebuilt *firebase.App in a constructor helper so tests and different deployments can vary credentials without changing code.


35-53: Tighten SendPN context and error handling to stabilize behavior

Right now SendPN uses context.Background() and returns a formatted error only when app.Messaging fails, but returns the raw client.Send error otherwise. This makes error shapes inconsistent (and brittle for tests) and ignores caller cancellation/timeouts.

Consider:

  • Accepting a context.Context from the caller (or at least threading a shared context through the call chain) instead of using context.Background().
  • Normalizing errors to a provider‑level message while preserving details, e.g.:
client, err := e.app.Messaging(ctx)
if err != nil {
    return fmt.Errorf("FirebaseProvider: get messaging client: %w", err)
}
if _, err := client.Send(ctx, message); err != nil {
    return fmt.Errorf("FirebaseProvider: send notification: %w", err)
}

This will also make it easier to update the tests so they no longer depend on legacy "FirebaseProvider: something went wrong" behavior or exact SDK error strings.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e6eaca8 and 1f529ec.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • .github/workflows/manual_deploy.yml (1 hunks)
  • Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • internal/main.go (2 hunks)
  • internal/providers/firebase.provider.go (1 hunks)
  • test/unit/providers/firebase_test.go (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (3)
internal/main.go (1)
internal/providers/firebase.provider.go (1)
  • NewFirebase (22-32)
internal/providers/firebase.provider.go (1)
config/logger.go (1)
  • GetLogger (11-17)
test/unit/providers/firebase_test.go (1)
internal/providers/firebase.provider.go (1)
  • NewFirebase (22-32)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Continuous Integration on Pull Request
test/unit/providers/firebase_test.go

[error] 86-86: TestFirebase/Test_fail_when_sending: expected error 'error getting Messaging client: project ID is required to access Firebase Cloud Messaging client' but got 'FirebaseProvider: something went wrong'.


[error] 48-48: TestFirebase/Test_succeed_when_sending: expected an error, but got nil.

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (6)
Dockerfile (3)

1-1: Go version now aligned with go.mod.

The builder image has been correctly updated to golang:1.24-alpine, matching the go 1.24.0 specification in go.mod. This resolves the previous version mismatch.


16-16: Verify compatibility of alpine 3.23.0.

The base image has been bumped significantly from alpine:3.16.2 to alpine:3.23.0. While alpine typically maintains good backward compatibility, this is a jump of 7 minor versions. Confirm that:

  • Any ca-certificates dependencies remain compatible
  • The nonroot user creation (line 18-19) works correctly on 3.23.0
  • There are no known CVEs affecting 3.23.0 that require immediate attention

18-24: Security improvements with nonroot user and port exposure.

The multi-stage Dockerfile now properly:

  • Creates a dedicated nonroot user and group for the final stage
  • Switches execution context to nonroot (line 23), improving security posture
  • Exposes port 5001 for the http_server service
  • Correctly copies built binaries from the builder stage
.github/workflows/manual_deploy.yml (1)

9-11: Action version upgrades look good.

The updates from actions/checkout@v4 to v6 and actions/setup-go@v2 to v6 align with the PR objective to bump dependencies. Ensure these versions are compatible with your workflows once the Go version mismatch is resolved.

test/unit/providers/firebase_test.go (1)

43-45: Constructor error handling now correctly fails fast on provider init errors

Using suite.T().Fatalf when NewFirebase returns an error prevents provider from being nil and avoids the previous nil‑pointer risk when calling SendPN. This aligns the tests with the new (*Firebase, error) constructor signature.

Also applies to: 81-83

internal/main.go (1)

23-26: Fail‑fast Firebase initialization removes nil‑provider risk

Initializing Firebase with firebase, errFirebase := p.NewFirebase() and aborting via log.Fatalf when errFirebase != nil correctly prevents a nil provider from reaching NewRandomPushNotificationManager, resolving the earlier potential nil‑pointer dereference.

The behavior is consistent with treating Firebase as a critical dependency.

uses: actions/setup-go@v2
uses: actions/setup-go@v6
with:
go-version: "^1.19"
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

find . -name "continuous_integration.yml" -o -name "ci.yml" -o -name "*ci*.yml" | grep -E "workflows|github" | head -20

Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification

Length of output: 122


🏁 Script executed:

cat -n ./.github/workflows/continuous_integration.yml | grep -A 2 -B 2 "go-version"

Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification

Length of output: 475


Align Go version constraint with CI workflow.

The manual deploy workflow specifies Go ^1.19, but the continuous integration workflow has been upgraded to Go 1.24.0. This version mismatch could cause inconsistent builds between manual deployments and CI, especially given that dependencies have been bumped in this PR.

Update the Go version constraint:

         with:
-          go-version: "^1.19"
+          go-version: "1.24.0"
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
go-version: "^1.19"
go-version: "1.24.0"
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
.github/workflows/manual_deploy.yml around line 13: the Go version constraint is
^1.19 which mismatches the CI workflow (Go 1.24.0); update the go-version entry
to match CI by replacing ^1.19 with 1.24.0 (or the same exact version string
used in CI) so manual deploy uses the same Go toolchain as CI.

Comment on lines 47 to 48
err := provider.SendPN(DeviceID, mockData.Title, mockData.Content)
assert.Equal(suite.T(), err, nil)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

Update test expectations to match new Firebase SDK–based error behavior

The failure test still expects the legacy "FirebaseProvider: something went wrong" string, and the success test assumes SendPN returns nil under your current gock setup. With the refactored provider now using firebase.App.Messaging and client.Send, the actual error in CI is "error getting Messaging client: project ID is required to access Firebase Cloud Messaging client", so these assertions no longer reflect real behavior.

Decide what the desired contract is and adjust accordingly, for example:

  • If you want to expose the SDK’s detailed error, update the failure test to assert on that message (or, better, that it contains a stable substring like "project ID is required"), and revisit the success test so it passes only when configuration is valid.
  • If you prefer a stable, provider‑level error (as before), change SendPN to wrap underlying errors into a consistent message and then align the tests with that new, stable string.

Until you reconcile these expectations with the provider’s behavior, the Firebase tests will continue to fail in CI.

Also applies to: 85-86

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Continuous Integration on Pull Request

[error] 48-48: TestFirebase/Test_succeed_when_sending: expected an error, but got nil.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In test/unit/providers/firebase_test.go around lines 47-48 (and also lines
85-86), the tests assert a legacy static error and nil return which no longer
match the refactored provider that uses firebase.App.Messaging and client.Send;
either update the tests to assert the SDK error behavior (e.g., assert error is
non-nil and its message contains a stable substring like "project ID is
required") or change the provider.SendPN implementation to wrap SDK errors into
a stable provider-level error string and then update the tests to expect that
wrapped message; choose one approach, implement it consistently for both the
failure and success cases, and ensure mocks/gock or test setup provide valid
configuration when asserting success.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
4 Security Hotspots

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1f529ec and 860b7f7.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • test/unit/providers/firebase_test.go (3 hunks)
  • test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • test/unit/providers/firebase_test.go
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis


// see https://www.twilio.com/docs/openapi/using-twilio-postman-collections
func (suite *TwilioTestSuite) Test_succeed_when_sending() {
suite.T().Skip()
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Get context around the skipped test to understand why it's being skipped
# and check for any related comments or documentation

# First, examine the test file around line 23
cd test/unit/providers && wc -l twilio_test.go

Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification

Length of output: 93


🏁 Script executed:

# Read the test file to understand the skipped test and its context
cat -n test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go | head -100

Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification

Length of output: 3393


🏁 Script executed:

# Find the Twilio provider implementation
fd -e go -type f | xargs rg -l "twilio" | grep -v test | head -10

Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification

Length of output: 406


🏁 Script executed:

# Check for comments around line 23 and the skip call
sed -n '15,35p' test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go

# Search for any TODO or related comments about Twilio skip
rg -B 5 -A 2 "\.Skip\(\)" test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go

Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification

Length of output: 877


🏁 Script executed:

# Get the test function name and full context
sed -n '20,50p' test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go

Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification

Length of output: 1337


🏁 Script executed:

# Check for any version information about Twilio
rg -i "twilio" go.mod go.sum 2>/dev/null || echo "Not found in go.mod/go.sum"

# Check for any comments in the test file about why tests are skipped
rg -B 10 "func.*Test_succeed_when_sending" test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go

Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification

Length of output: 594


🏁 Script executed:

# Check all Skip() calls in the test files to see the pattern
rg -n "\.Skip\(\)" test/unit/providers/ -C 3

# Also check if there's any issue or comment in the repo root
find . -maxdepth 2 -name "*.md" -o -name "*.txt" | xargs grep -l -i "skip\|twilio" 2>/dev/null | head -5

Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification

Length of output: 1686


🏁 Script executed:

# Find and examine the Twilio provider
fd -type f -name "*.go" | xargs rg -l "package.*provider" | xargs rg -l "twilio" | grep -v test

# If found, show the file content (limited lines)
fd -type f -name "*twilio*.go" | grep -v test | head -1 | xargs cat -n

Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification

Length of output: 472


🏁 Script executed:

# List the providers directory structure
find . -path "*/providers/*" -name "*.go" | grep -v test | sort

# Specifically look for twilio provider
fd -type f ".*twilio" | grep -v test

Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification

Length of output: 550


🏁 Script executed:

# Check what's in the test/unit/providers directory
ls -la test/unit/providers/ | head -20

# And check for the actual providers directory
find . -type d -name "providers" | head -5

Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification

Length of output: 685


🏁 Script executed:

# Read the complete test file
cat test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go

Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification

Length of output: 2784


🏁 Script executed:

# Find all Go files that reference twilio (case-insensitive)
rg -i "twilio" --type go -l | grep -v test

# Also check the main source structure
find . -type f -name "*.go" -path "*/internal/*" | head -10

Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification

Length of output: 650


🏁 Script executed:

# List the root level directories
ls -la | grep "^d" | head -15

# Show git status to understand what files were changed
git ls-files | grep -i twilio

Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification

Length of output: 709


🏁 Script executed:

# Check recent git log for this file
git log --oneline test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go | head -5

# Show the actual change in this commit
git diff HEAD^ test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go 2>/dev/null || git show HEAD:test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go | head -50

Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification

Length of output: 1704


🏁 Script executed:

# First check if the file exists and its size
wc -l test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go

# Then read it with line numbers
head -100 test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go | cat -n

Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification

Length of output: 3431


🏁 Script executed:

# Check the file exists
test -f test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go && echo "File exists" || echo "File not found"

# List all test files in that directory
ls -1 test/unit/providers/*.go 2>/dev/null || ls -1 test/unit/providers/ 2>/dev/null || find test -name "*twilio*" 2>/dev/null

Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification

Length of output: 339


🏁 Script executed:

# Try reading with python to ensure we get the content
python3 << 'PYEOF'
try:
    with open('test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go', 'r') as f:
        lines = f.readlines()
    # Show lines 15-50 to get context
    for i in range(14, min(50, len(lines))):
        print(f"{i+1}: {lines[i]}", end='')
except FileNotFoundError:
    print("File not found")
    # Try to find twilio test files
    import os
    for root, dirs, files in os.walk('.'):
        for f in files:
            if 'twilio' in f.lower() and f.endswith('_test.go'):
                print(f"Found: {os.path.join(root, f)}")
PYEOF

Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification

Length of output: 162


🏁 Script executed:

# Search for any test file containing "Test_succeed_when_sending" (the test function mentioned)
rg -l "Test_succeed_when_sending" . 2>/dev/null

# Also search for Skip in test files
rg "\.Skip\(\)" . --type go 2>/dev/null | head -20

Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification

Length of output: 701


🏁 Script executed:

# List the test directory structure
find test -type f -name "*.go" 2>/dev/null | sort

# Specifically look for provider test files
find test -path "*provider*" -name "*.go" 2>/dev/null | sort

Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification

Length of output: 1281


🏁 Script executed:

# Use git to find files
git ls-files | grep -i twilio

# Search for the specific test function mentioned
git ls-files --stage | head -20

Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification

Length of output: 1623


🏁 Script executed:

# Just try to show the file with basic commands
[ -f "test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go" ] && head -n 50 "test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go" || echo "Checking git for file"

# If not in working directory, check git
git show HEAD:test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go 2>/dev/null | head -50

Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification

Length of output: 3277


🏁 Script executed:

# Show top level structure
ls -la

# Show git status
git status --short | head -20

Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification

Length of output: 1345


🏁 Script executed:

# Direct approach: use git to show the file
git show HEAD:test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go

Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification

Length of output: 2784


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Comprehensive search for Twilio-related files and skip calls

echo "=== Searching for Twilio test files ==="
find . -type f -name "*twilio*" 2>/dev/null

echo -e "\n=== Git files with twilio ==="
git ls-files 2>/dev/null | grep -i twilio

echo -e "\n=== Searching for Skip() calls ==="
rg "\.Skip\(\)" --type go 2>/dev/null | head -30

echo -e "\n=== Repository structure ==="
ls -la
pwd

Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification

Length of output: 1814


🏁 Script executed:

# Use git to show the exact file that was changed
git diff --name-only HEAD~1 2>/dev/null | head -20

# Try to find any untracked or modified files
git status 2>/dev/null | grep -E "(modified|new file)" | head -20

# Direct file access attempt
if [ -f "test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go" ]; then
  sed -n '15,40p' test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go
else
  echo "File check failed, trying git object..."
  git show HEAD:test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go 2>&1 | sed -n '15,40p'
fi

Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification

Length of output: 926


🏁 Script executed:

# Search for all test skips to understand the pattern
rg -B 5 "\.Skip\(\)" . --type go 2>/dev/null | head -60

# Also search for any TODO or FIXME comments related to skips
rg "TODO|FIXME" . --type go 2>/dev/null | grep -i "skip\|test\|twilio" | head -20

Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification

Length of output: 1657


🏁 Script executed:

python3 << 'EOF'
import os
import subprocess

# Try multiple approaches
paths_to_try = [
    'test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go',
    './test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go',
]

for path in paths_to_try:
    if os.path.exists(path):
        print(f"Found file at {path}")
        with open(path, 'r') as f:
            lines = f.readlines()
            print(f"File has {len(lines)} lines\n")
            print("Lines 15-40:")
            for i in range(14, min(40, len(lines))):
                print(f"{i+1}: {lines[i]}", end='')
        break
else:
    print("File not found in working directory, trying git...")
    try:
        result = subprocess.run(['git', 'show', 'HEAD:test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go'], 
                              capture_output=True, text=True, timeout=5)
        if result.returncode == 0:
            lines = result.stdout.split('\n')
            print("Lines 15-40 from git:")
            for i in range(14, min(40, len(lines))):
                print(f"{i+1}: {lines[i]}")
        else:
            print(f"Git error: {result.stderr}")
    except Exception as e:
        print(f"Error: {e}")
EOF

Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification

Length of output: 162


Test skip lacks explanation—add TODO comment or clarify before merging.

Line 23 skips the success path test without an inline comment. This removes validation of the primary functionality (SendWhats call at line 58). The commit message "skip for now" indicates a temporary skip, but this should be documented in code.

Adding a TODO comment explaining what needs to be fixed and when is required. If this is more than temporary, clarify whether the Twilio integration is broken or if there's a mocking/test environment issue.

Note: Firebase tests also have skips (both success and failure tests at lines 24 and 53), suggesting a broader pattern that may indicate compatibility issues from recent dependency changes.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go around line 23, the test is being skipped
with suite.T().Skip() without any explanatory comment; update the test by either
re-enabling it (fixing mocking or environment issues so SendWhats path at ~line
58 is exercised) or add a clear TODO comment on the same line explaining why
it’s skipped, what needs to be fixed, and an expected timeframe or ticket/issue
reference; ensure similar skips in Firebase tests are annotated consistently or
fixed if the underlying cause is shared.

@AndrewHanasiro AndrewHanasiro merged commit 2fdd4a4 into main Dec 11, 2025
9 of 12 checks passed
@AndrewHanasiro AndrewHanasiro deleted the feature/update branch December 11, 2025 15:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants