-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
feat: update #42
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: update #42
Conversation
WalkthroughBumps Go to 1.24, upgrades many dependencies, converts Dockerfile to a multi-stage non-root image exposing port 5001, refactors Firebase provider to use firebase.App and Messaging with error returns, updates main and tests to handle constructor errors, and upgrades CI workflows and README badge removal. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
autonumber
actor App as Application / main
participant Provider as Firebase Provider
participant SDK as firebase.App & Messaging SDK
participant FCM as Firebase Cloud Messaging
App->>Provider: NewFirebase(ctx, credsFile)
Provider->>SDK: firebase.NewApp(ctx, optsWithCreds)
SDK-->>Provider: *firebase.App or error
Provider-->>App: (*Firebase, error)
alt success
App->>Provider: SendPN(ctx, token, data)
Provider->>SDK: app.Messaging(ctx) -> Messaging client
Provider->>FCM: client.Send(ctx, messaging.Message{Token, Data})
FCM-->>Provider: messageID / error
Provider-->>App: return messageID or error
else failure
Provider-->>App: return init/send error
end
Estimated code review effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~50 minutes
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 5
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
Dockerfile (1)
16-24: Security hardening looks good, but missing CMD/ENTRYPOINT.The nonroot user setup is a good security practice. However, the Dockerfile lacks a
CMDorENTRYPOINTinstruction, so the container won't know which binary to execute on startup.USER nonroot EXPOSE 5001 +CMD ["./http_server"]
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
internal/providers/firebase.provider.go (2)
38-44: Consider usingNotificationfield for automatic display.Using the
Datamap requires the client app to manually handle and display the notification. For standard push notifications that should appear automatically in the system tray, use theNotificationfield instead or in addition toData.message := &messaging.Message{ - Data: map[string]string{ - "Title": title, - "Body": content, - }, - Token: deviceID, + Notification: &messaging.Notification{ + Title: title, + Body: content, + }, + Token: deviceID, }
25-25: Hardcoded credentials file path reduces deployment flexibility.Consider making the credentials path configurable via environment variable or config to support different deployment environments.
+import "os" + +func getCredentialsPath() string { + if path := os.Getenv("FIREBASE_CREDENTIALS_PATH"); path != "" { + return path + } + return "./service-account-file.json" +} + func NewFirebase() (*Firebase, error) { instance := new(Firebase) - opt := option.WithCredentialsFile("./service-account-file.json") + opt := option.WithCredentialsFile(getCredentialsPath())
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
Dockerfile(2 hunks)README.md(0 hunks)go.mod(1 hunks)internal/main.go(2 hunks)internal/providers/firebase.provider.go(1 hunks)test/unit/providers/firebase_test.go(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- README.md
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (3)
internal/main.go (1)
internal/providers/firebase.provider.go (1)
NewFirebase(23-33)
internal/providers/firebase.provider.go (1)
config/logger.go (1)
GetLogger(11-17)
test/unit/providers/firebase_test.go (1)
internal/providers/firebase.provider.go (1)
NewFirebase(23-33)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
- GitHub Check: Test
- GitHub Check: Build
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (4)
go.mod (2)
6-20: Dependency updates look reasonable.The modernization of direct dependencies including Firebase v4.18.0, OpenTelemetry v1.39.0, and others aligns with the Firebase SDK refactoring. Ensure
go.sumis updated and tests pass with the new versions.
3-3: > Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.test/unit/providers/firebase_test.go (1)
30-42: Gock mocks may not intercept Firebase SDK calls.The Firebase SDK (v4) uses gRPC and the Admin SDK internally, which may not be intercepted by gock HTTP mocks. The
NewFirebase()function reads credentials from a file (./service-account-file.json), so these tests will likely fail in CI without that file present. Consider using dependency injection or mocking the Firebase App to make these tests more reliable.internal/providers/firebase.provider.go (1)
50-54: Good: Direct error propagation from SDK.The simplified error handling using the SDK's native error is cleaner than the previous manual HTTP response parsing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/continuous_integration.yml(3 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/continuous_integration.yml (3)
50-50: Clarify the removal of Code Climate Scan step.The Code Climate Scan step (previously present in the Test job) has been removed. The summary mentions removal but doesn't explain the rationale. Please clarify whether this is:
- An intentional deprecation of Code Climate coverage tracking
- A temporary removal that will be re-added
- A cost/dependency simplification
This change affects code quality metrics visibility in the PR workflow.
33-35: No action needed — Go 1.24.0 is a stable, supported release.Go 1.24.0 was released on February 11, 2025, and is part of the stable 1.24 release series. The upgrade from 1.23.1 to 1.24.0 is safe and uses a well-established version.
Also applies to: 71-73
33-33: Confirm actions/setup-go@v6 compatibility with current workflow.Breaking changes exist in v6: toolchain handling has been improved, Node.js runtime upgraded from Node 20 to Node 24, and runner version v2.327.1+ is required. Your workflow explicitly pins Go to 1.24.0 and uses ubuntu-latest runners, which should satisfy these requirements. No action needed unless you experience version resolution issues.
| steps: | ||
| - name: Checkout repo | ||
| uses: actions/checkout@v4 | ||
| uses: actions/checkout@v6 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🧩 Analysis chain
🌐 Web query:
actions/checkout v6 breaking changes compared to v4
💡 Result:
Short summary — main breaking changes in actions/checkout@v6 vs v4:
-
persist-credentials behavior changed: credentials are no longer written directly into .git/config; they are stored in a separate file under $RUNNER_TEMP. This affects any workflow that relied on the token being present in the repo’s git config. [1][2]
-
Docker/container workflow note: running authenticated git commands from inside a Docker container action now requires a newer Actions Runner (minimum v2.329.0) to access the persisted credentials. If your runners are older, container-based authenticated git commands may fail. [1][2]
-
Runtime / runner compatibility: newer releases (v5→v6) moved action runtimes (node24) and introduced minimum runner versions for compatibility; while v6 itself emphasizes the credential change, you should confirm your self-hosted/enterprise runner versions when upgrading from v4. [1][3]
-
No other workflow changes required for normal checkout/fetch/push semantics — fetch-depth, ref, repository, token, etc. remain supported, but some edge cases around credential location and Git/runner version (Git behavior changes on runners) may require adjustments. [1][4]
Sources:
[1] actions/checkout README (v6 notes).
[2] GitHub Marketplace checkout listing (v6 release notes).
[3] actions/checkout commit updating refs to v6.
[4] Community/issue reports re: git/runner interactions with checkout v4/v6.
🌐 Web query:
actions/checkout v6 fetch-depth parameter support
💡 Result:
Yes — actions/checkout@v6 supports the fetch-depth input. Default is 1 (single commit); set fetch-depth: 0 to fetch full history (or any integer >1 to fetch that many commits). [1][2]
Sources:
- actions/checkout README (inputs & examples). [1]
- GitHub Marketplace checkout v6 notes (examples showing fetch-depth). [2]
Review the persist-credentials behavior change in actions/checkout@v6.
The upgrade from v4 to v6 introduces a breaking change: credentials are no longer written directly into .git/config but instead stored in a separate file under $RUNNER_TEMP. This affects workflows that rely on the token being present in the repo's git config. The fetch-depth: 0 setting on line 31 remains fully supported with no changes. However, if using container-based authenticated git commands, confirm your runners are at least v2.329.0 to access the persisted credentials.
Also applies to: 59-59, 69-69
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
.github/workflows/continuous_integration.yml lines 29 (and also check lines 59
and 69): upgrading actions/checkout@v4→@v6 changes persist-credentials behavior
so tokens are no longer written to .git/config but stored under $RUNNER_TEMP;
update the workflow to explicitly set persist-credentials: true or false as
appropriate and/or adjust any steps that expect credentials in .git/config to
instead read credentials from the RUNNER_TEMP location or use the checkout
action output; if you need container-based authenticated git commands, ensure
the runner version is >= v2.329.0 and document this requirement in the workflow
comments.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
internal/providers/firebase.provider.go (2)
21-32: Avoid hard‑coded credentials path; prefer configuration or dependency injection
NewFirebasecurrently hard‑codes./service-account-file.jsonand creates thefirebase.Appdirectly. This couples runtime behavior to the working directory and makes tests/other environments harder to control.Consider taking the credentials path (or the
option.ClientOption) from configuration and/or accepting a prebuilt*firebase.Appin a constructor helper so tests and different deployments can vary credentials without changing code.
35-53: Tighten SendPN context and error handling to stabilize behaviorRight now
SendPNusescontext.Background()and returns a formatted error only whenapp.Messagingfails, but returns the rawclient.Senderror otherwise. This makes error shapes inconsistent (and brittle for tests) and ignores caller cancellation/timeouts.Consider:
- Accepting a
context.Contextfrom the caller (or at least threading a shared context through the call chain) instead of usingcontext.Background().- Normalizing errors to a provider‑level message while preserving details, e.g.:
client, err := e.app.Messaging(ctx) if err != nil { return fmt.Errorf("FirebaseProvider: get messaging client: %w", err) } if _, err := client.Send(ctx, message); err != nil { return fmt.Errorf("FirebaseProvider: send notification: %w", err) }This will also make it easier to update the tests so they no longer depend on legacy
"FirebaseProvider: something went wrong"behavior or exact SDK error strings.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
.github/workflows/manual_deploy.yml(1 hunks)Dockerfile(2 hunks)internal/main.go(2 hunks)internal/providers/firebase.provider.go(1 hunks)test/unit/providers/firebase_test.go(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (3)
internal/main.go (1)
internal/providers/firebase.provider.go (1)
NewFirebase(22-32)
internal/providers/firebase.provider.go (1)
config/logger.go (1)
GetLogger(11-17)
test/unit/providers/firebase_test.go (1)
internal/providers/firebase.provider.go (1)
NewFirebase(22-32)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Continuous Integration on Pull Request
test/unit/providers/firebase_test.go
[error] 86-86: TestFirebase/Test_fail_when_sending: expected error 'error getting Messaging client: project ID is required to access Firebase Cloud Messaging client' but got 'FirebaseProvider: something went wrong'.
[error] 48-48: TestFirebase/Test_succeed_when_sending: expected an error, but got nil.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (6)
Dockerfile (3)
1-1: Go version now aligned with go.mod.The builder image has been correctly updated to
golang:1.24-alpine, matching thego 1.24.0specification in go.mod. This resolves the previous version mismatch.
16-16: Verify compatibility of alpine 3.23.0.The base image has been bumped significantly from
alpine:3.16.2toalpine:3.23.0. While alpine typically maintains good backward compatibility, this is a jump of 7 minor versions. Confirm that:
- Any ca-certificates dependencies remain compatible
- The nonroot user creation (line 18-19) works correctly on 3.23.0
- There are no known CVEs affecting 3.23.0 that require immediate attention
18-24: Security improvements with nonroot user and port exposure.The multi-stage Dockerfile now properly:
- Creates a dedicated nonroot user and group for the final stage
- Switches execution context to nonroot (line 23), improving security posture
- Exposes port 5001 for the http_server service
- Correctly copies built binaries from the builder stage
.github/workflows/manual_deploy.yml (1)
9-11: Action version upgrades look good.The updates from
actions/checkout@v4tov6andactions/setup-go@v2tov6align with the PR objective to bump dependencies. Ensure these versions are compatible with your workflows once the Go version mismatch is resolved.test/unit/providers/firebase_test.go (1)
43-45: Constructor error handling now correctly fails fast on provider init errorsUsing
suite.T().FatalfwhenNewFirebasereturns an error preventsproviderfrom being nil and avoids the previous nil‑pointer risk when callingSendPN. This aligns the tests with the new(*Firebase, error)constructor signature.Also applies to: 81-83
internal/main.go (1)
23-26: Fail‑fast Firebase initialization removes nil‑provider riskInitializing Firebase with
firebase, errFirebase := p.NewFirebase()and aborting vialog.FatalfwhenerrFirebase != nilcorrectly prevents a nil provider from reachingNewRandomPushNotificationManager, resolving the earlier potential nil‑pointer dereference.The behavior is consistent with treating Firebase as a critical dependency.
| uses: actions/setup-go@v2 | ||
| uses: actions/setup-go@v6 | ||
| with: | ||
| go-version: "^1.19" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
find . -name "continuous_integration.yml" -o -name "ci.yml" -o -name "*ci*.yml" | grep -E "workflows|github" | head -20Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification
Length of output: 122
🏁 Script executed:
cat -n ./.github/workflows/continuous_integration.yml | grep -A 2 -B 2 "go-version"Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification
Length of output: 475
Align Go version constraint with CI workflow.
The manual deploy workflow specifies Go ^1.19, but the continuous integration workflow has been upgraded to Go 1.24.0. This version mismatch could cause inconsistent builds between manual deployments and CI, especially given that dependencies have been bumped in this PR.
Update the Go version constraint:
with:
- go-version: "^1.19"
+ go-version: "1.24.0"📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| go-version: "^1.19" | |
| go-version: "1.24.0" |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
.github/workflows/manual_deploy.yml around line 13: the Go version constraint is
^1.19 which mismatches the CI workflow (Go 1.24.0); update the go-version entry
to match CI by replacing ^1.19 with 1.24.0 (or the same exact version string
used in CI) so manual deploy uses the same Go toolchain as CI.
| err := provider.SendPN(DeviceID, mockData.Title, mockData.Content) | ||
| assert.Equal(suite.T(), err, nil) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Update test expectations to match new Firebase SDK–based error behavior
The failure test still expects the legacy "FirebaseProvider: something went wrong" string, and the success test assumes SendPN returns nil under your current gock setup. With the refactored provider now using firebase.App.Messaging and client.Send, the actual error in CI is "error getting Messaging client: project ID is required to access Firebase Cloud Messaging client", so these assertions no longer reflect real behavior.
Decide what the desired contract is and adjust accordingly, for example:
- If you want to expose the SDK’s detailed error, update the failure test to assert on that message (or, better, that it contains a stable substring like
"project ID is required"), and revisit the success test so it passes only when configuration is valid. - If you prefer a stable, provider‑level error (as before), change
SendPNto wrap underlying errors into a consistent message and then align the tests with that new, stable string.
Until you reconcile these expectations with the provider’s behavior, the Firebase tests will continue to fail in CI.
Also applies to: 85-86
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Continuous Integration on Pull Request
[error] 48-48: TestFirebase/Test_succeed_when_sending: expected an error, but got nil.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In test/unit/providers/firebase_test.go around lines 47-48 (and also lines
85-86), the tests assert a legacy static error and nil return which no longer
match the refactored provider that uses firebase.App.Messaging and client.Send;
either update the tests to assert the SDK error behavior (e.g., assert error is
non-nil and its message contains a stable substring like "project ID is
required") or change the provider.SendPN implementation to wrap SDK errors into
a stable provider-level error string and then update the tests to expect that
wrapped message; choose one approach, implement it consistently for both the
failure and success cases, and ensure mocks/gock or test setup provide valid
configuration when asserting success.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
test/unit/providers/firebase_test.go(3 hunks)test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- test/unit/providers/firebase_test.go
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
|
|
||
| // see https://www.twilio.com/docs/openapi/using-twilio-postman-collections | ||
| func (suite *TwilioTestSuite) Test_succeed_when_sending() { | ||
| suite.T().Skip() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Get context around the skipped test to understand why it's being skipped
# and check for any related comments or documentation
# First, examine the test file around line 23
cd test/unit/providers && wc -l twilio_test.goRepository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification
Length of output: 93
🏁 Script executed:
# Read the test file to understand the skipped test and its context
cat -n test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go | head -100Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification
Length of output: 3393
🏁 Script executed:
# Find the Twilio provider implementation
fd -e go -type f | xargs rg -l "twilio" | grep -v test | head -10Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification
Length of output: 406
🏁 Script executed:
# Check for comments around line 23 and the skip call
sed -n '15,35p' test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go
# Search for any TODO or related comments about Twilio skip
rg -B 5 -A 2 "\.Skip\(\)" test/unit/providers/twilio_test.goRepository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification
Length of output: 877
🏁 Script executed:
# Get the test function name and full context
sed -n '20,50p' test/unit/providers/twilio_test.goRepository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification
Length of output: 1337
🏁 Script executed:
# Check for any version information about Twilio
rg -i "twilio" go.mod go.sum 2>/dev/null || echo "Not found in go.mod/go.sum"
# Check for any comments in the test file about why tests are skipped
rg -B 10 "func.*Test_succeed_when_sending" test/unit/providers/twilio_test.goRepository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification
Length of output: 594
🏁 Script executed:
# Check all Skip() calls in the test files to see the pattern
rg -n "\.Skip\(\)" test/unit/providers/ -C 3
# Also check if there's any issue or comment in the repo root
find . -maxdepth 2 -name "*.md" -o -name "*.txt" | xargs grep -l -i "skip\|twilio" 2>/dev/null | head -5Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification
Length of output: 1686
🏁 Script executed:
# Find and examine the Twilio provider
fd -type f -name "*.go" | xargs rg -l "package.*provider" | xargs rg -l "twilio" | grep -v test
# If found, show the file content (limited lines)
fd -type f -name "*twilio*.go" | grep -v test | head -1 | xargs cat -nRepository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification
Length of output: 472
🏁 Script executed:
# List the providers directory structure
find . -path "*/providers/*" -name "*.go" | grep -v test | sort
# Specifically look for twilio provider
fd -type f ".*twilio" | grep -v testRepository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification
Length of output: 550
🏁 Script executed:
# Check what's in the test/unit/providers directory
ls -la test/unit/providers/ | head -20
# And check for the actual providers directory
find . -type d -name "providers" | head -5Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification
Length of output: 685
🏁 Script executed:
# Read the complete test file
cat test/unit/providers/twilio_test.goRepository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification
Length of output: 2784
🏁 Script executed:
# Find all Go files that reference twilio (case-insensitive)
rg -i "twilio" --type go -l | grep -v test
# Also check the main source structure
find . -type f -name "*.go" -path "*/internal/*" | head -10Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification
Length of output: 650
🏁 Script executed:
# List the root level directories
ls -la | grep "^d" | head -15
# Show git status to understand what files were changed
git ls-files | grep -i twilioRepository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification
Length of output: 709
🏁 Script executed:
# Check recent git log for this file
git log --oneline test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go | head -5
# Show the actual change in this commit
git diff HEAD^ test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go 2>/dev/null || git show HEAD:test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go | head -50Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification
Length of output: 1704
🏁 Script executed:
# First check if the file exists and its size
wc -l test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go
# Then read it with line numbers
head -100 test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go | cat -nRepository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification
Length of output: 3431
🏁 Script executed:
# Check the file exists
test -f test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go && echo "File exists" || echo "File not found"
# List all test files in that directory
ls -1 test/unit/providers/*.go 2>/dev/null || ls -1 test/unit/providers/ 2>/dev/null || find test -name "*twilio*" 2>/dev/nullRepository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification
Length of output: 339
🏁 Script executed:
# Try reading with python to ensure we get the content
python3 << 'PYEOF'
try:
with open('test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go', 'r') as f:
lines = f.readlines()
# Show lines 15-50 to get context
for i in range(14, min(50, len(lines))):
print(f"{i+1}: {lines[i]}", end='')
except FileNotFoundError:
print("File not found")
# Try to find twilio test files
import os
for root, dirs, files in os.walk('.'):
for f in files:
if 'twilio' in f.lower() and f.endswith('_test.go'):
print(f"Found: {os.path.join(root, f)}")
PYEOFRepository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification
Length of output: 162
🏁 Script executed:
# Search for any test file containing "Test_succeed_when_sending" (the test function mentioned)
rg -l "Test_succeed_when_sending" . 2>/dev/null
# Also search for Skip in test files
rg "\.Skip\(\)" . --type go 2>/dev/null | head -20Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification
Length of output: 701
🏁 Script executed:
# List the test directory structure
find test -type f -name "*.go" 2>/dev/null | sort
# Specifically look for provider test files
find test -path "*provider*" -name "*.go" 2>/dev/null | sortRepository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification
Length of output: 1281
🏁 Script executed:
# Use git to find files
git ls-files | grep -i twilio
# Search for the specific test function mentioned
git ls-files --stage | head -20Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification
Length of output: 1623
🏁 Script executed:
# Just try to show the file with basic commands
[ -f "test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go" ] && head -n 50 "test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go" || echo "Checking git for file"
# If not in working directory, check git
git show HEAD:test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go 2>/dev/null | head -50Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification
Length of output: 3277
🏁 Script executed:
# Show top level structure
ls -la
# Show git status
git status --short | head -20Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification
Length of output: 1345
🏁 Script executed:
# Direct approach: use git to show the file
git show HEAD:test/unit/providers/twilio_test.goRepository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification
Length of output: 2784
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Comprehensive search for Twilio-related files and skip calls
echo "=== Searching for Twilio test files ==="
find . -type f -name "*twilio*" 2>/dev/null
echo -e "\n=== Git files with twilio ==="
git ls-files 2>/dev/null | grep -i twilio
echo -e "\n=== Searching for Skip() calls ==="
rg "\.Skip\(\)" --type go 2>/dev/null | head -30
echo -e "\n=== Repository structure ==="
ls -la
pwdRepository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification
Length of output: 1814
🏁 Script executed:
# Use git to show the exact file that was changed
git diff --name-only HEAD~1 2>/dev/null | head -20
# Try to find any untracked or modified files
git status 2>/dev/null | grep -E "(modified|new file)" | head -20
# Direct file access attempt
if [ -f "test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go" ]; then
sed -n '15,40p' test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go
else
echo "File check failed, trying git object..."
git show HEAD:test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go 2>&1 | sed -n '15,40p'
fiRepository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification
Length of output: 926
🏁 Script executed:
# Search for all test skips to understand the pattern
rg -B 5 "\.Skip\(\)" . --type go 2>/dev/null | head -60
# Also search for any TODO or FIXME comments related to skips
rg "TODO|FIXME" . --type go 2>/dev/null | grep -i "skip\|test\|twilio" | head -20Repository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification
Length of output: 1657
🏁 Script executed:
python3 << 'EOF'
import os
import subprocess
# Try multiple approaches
paths_to_try = [
'test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go',
'./test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go',
]
for path in paths_to_try:
if os.path.exists(path):
print(f"Found file at {path}")
with open(path, 'r') as f:
lines = f.readlines()
print(f"File has {len(lines)} lines\n")
print("Lines 15-40:")
for i in range(14, min(40, len(lines))):
print(f"{i+1}: {lines[i]}", end='')
break
else:
print("File not found in working directory, trying git...")
try:
result = subprocess.run(['git', 'show', 'HEAD:test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go'],
capture_output=True, text=True, timeout=5)
if result.returncode == 0:
lines = result.stdout.split('\n')
print("Lines 15-40 from git:")
for i in range(14, min(40, len(lines))):
print(f"{i+1}: {lines[i]}")
else:
print(f"Git error: {result.stderr}")
except Exception as e:
print(f"Error: {e}")
EOFRepository: auth-plus/auth-plus-notification
Length of output: 162
Test skip lacks explanation—add TODO comment or clarify before merging.
Line 23 skips the success path test without an inline comment. This removes validation of the primary functionality (SendWhats call at line 58). The commit message "skip for now" indicates a temporary skip, but this should be documented in code.
Adding a TODO comment explaining what needs to be fixed and when is required. If this is more than temporary, clarify whether the Twilio integration is broken or if there's a mocking/test environment issue.
Note: Firebase tests also have skips (both success and failure tests at lines 24 and 53), suggesting a broader pattern that may indicate compatibility issues from recent dependency changes.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In test/unit/providers/twilio_test.go around line 23, the test is being skipped
with suite.T().Skip() without any explanatory comment; update the test by either
re-enabling it (fixing mocking or environment issues so SendWhats path at ~line
58 is exercised) or add a clear TODO comment on the same line explaining why
it’s skipped, what needs to be fixed, and an expected timeframe or ticket/issue
reference; ensure similar skips in Firebase tests are annotated consistently or
fixed if the underlying cause is shared.


Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Tests
Documentation
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.