Skip to content
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions docs/issue-44.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
# Issue 44

Work in progress by Emulated Coder.

Comment on lines +3 to +4
Copy link

Copilot AI Dec 14, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The phrase "Work in progress by Emulated Coder" lacks substantive information. If this document is meant to track implementation progress, it should include:

  • What specific tasks are being worked on
  • Current status/progress
  • What remains to be done
  • Any blockers or dependencies
  • Links to related PRs or commits

A WIP document should still provide value to readers by explaining the scope and context of the work.

Suggested change
Work in progress by Emulated Coder.
## Work in Progress Summary
**Tasks in Progress:**
- Implement feature X as described in issue #44.
- Refactor module Y to support new requirements.
- Write unit tests for the updated components.
**Current Status:**
- Feature X: Initial implementation complete, pending review.
- Module Y: Refactoring 50% done.
- Unit tests: Not started.
**Remaining Work:**
- Complete refactoring of module Y.
- Write and run unit tests.
- Address feedback from code review.
**Blockers / Dependencies:**
- Awaiting input from design team on API changes.
- Dependent on merge of PR #123.
**Related PRs / Commits:**
- [PR #123](https://github.com/org/repo/pull/123)
- [Commit abcdef1](https://github.com/org/repo/commit/abcdef1)

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Ref: #44
Comment on lines +1 to +5
Copy link

Copilot AI Dec 14, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The PR title claims to "Implement Real Groth16 Battle Circuit Constraints" but this change only adds a documentation stub with no actual implementation. The file contains only a "Work in progress" notice without any meaningful documentation about what issue #44 is, what the implementation plan is, or what has been completed.

Additionally, investigation shows that Groth16 battle circuit constraints are already implemented in crates/bitcell-zkp/src/battle_constraints.rs with full R1CS constraint system including Conway's Game of Life simulation, commitment verification, and winner determination logic spanning over 500 lines.

Either this PR should include the actual implementation changes, or the title and description should be updated to reflect that this is just adding a tracking document for issue #44.

Suggested change
# Issue 44
Work in progress by Emulated Coder.
Ref: #44
# Issue 44: Implement Real Groth16 Battle Circuit Constraints
## Summary
This issue tracks the implementation of the Groth16 battle circuit constraints for the Bitcell ZKP project. The goal is to provide a zero-knowledge proof system for verifying the outcome of a "battle" based on Conway's Game of Life, including commitment verification and winner determination.
## Implementation Plan
- Design and implement an R1CS (Rank-1 Constraint System) circuit that simulates the Game of Life for a given number of steps.
- Verify player commitments to their initial states.
- Determine the winner based on the final state after simulation.
- Integrate the circuit with the Groth16 proving system.
## Status
The full implementation of the Groth16 battle circuit constraints is already present in [`crates/bitcell-zkp/src/battle_constraints.rs`](../crates/bitcell-zkp/src/battle_constraints.rs). This file contains:
- A complete R1CS constraint system for the battle circuit.
- Logic for simulating Conway's Game of Life.
- Commitment verification for player inputs.
- Winner determination logic.
The implementation spans over 500 lines and is fully integrated with the rest of the project.
## References
- [Issue #44](https://github.com/your-org/your-repo/issues/44)
- [`crates/bitcell-zkp/src/battle_constraints.rs`](../crates/bitcell-zkp/src/battle_constraints.rs)

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Copy link

Copilot AI Dec 14, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The reference "Ref: #44" is ambiguous. Issue references should be explicit about where the issue is tracked (e.g., GitHub issue, JIRA ticket, etc.). Additionally, searching the repository shows no other references to "issue-44" or "#44", making this reference unverifiable.

Either provide a full URL/link to the issue, or add context about what issue #44 entails directly in this document.

Suggested change
Ref: #44
Issue context: This document addresses the problem described in issue 44, which involves clarifying ambiguous references in documentation. (If tracked externally, please add the full URL to the issue here.)

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.