Skip to content

Conversation

@daphnehanse11
Copy link

Analyzes a reform that makes families eligible for CDCTC if at least one parent works (vs both parents under current law).

Key findings (2026):

  • Additional cost: ~$0.74B (+12.7%)
  • New claimants: ~0.92M families
  • Average benefit for new claimants: ~$658

daphnehanse11 and others added 8 commits January 9, 2026 09:09
Analyzes a reform that makes families eligible for CDCTC if at least one parent works (vs both parents under current law).

Key findings (2026):
- Additional cost: ~$0.74B (+12.7%)
- New claimants: ~0.92M families
- Average benefit for new claimants: ~$658

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Updated cost estimate to $0.74B (was $0.7-1.4B)
- Updated claimant count to 920,000 (was 1-2M)
- Added note about average credit reduction
- Added implementation note explaining cdcc_relevant_expenses override

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
States with federal CDCC matches are also affected:
- South Carolina: +$28.6M (+59.9%)
- Rhode Island: +$0.6M (+9.8%)
- Total state impact: ~$29M

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Key findings:
- 12 states affected by the reform
- California: +$142M (largest impact)
- South Carolina: +$29M
- Maryland: +$20M (combined)
- Total state impact: ~$204M
- Combined federal + state: ~$944M

Sources: NCSL, First Five Years Fund

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Demonstrates how a one-earner family in SC benefits from both:
- Federal CDCC under the reform
- SC state CDCC (7% of federal)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…or states

- Use income_tax change for federal budgetary impact (-$437M)
- Use state_cdcc aggregated variable for total state impact ($198M)
- Simplified state-by-state breakdown using direct variable calculations
- Updated summary with accurate metrics

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
CDCC cost is the gross credit increase, income_tax change is lower
because CDCC is non-refundable (can only reduce liability to $0)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant