Skip to content

Conversation

@adam-rosenorn
Copy link
Collaborator

Can probably be added a bit more to it, but thought it was good start to at least have a useable readme on main

README.md Outdated

### Triggering GitHub Workflow

The workflow can be triggered either on pull requests to main or manually.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Write main using typewriter font: main

README.md Outdated
<a target="_blank" href="https://cookiecutter-data-science.drivendata.org/">
<img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/CCDS-Project%20template-328F97?logo=cookiecutter" />
</a>
This project is part of the Software Development and Software Engineering at ITU. The original project description can be found [here](https://github.com/lasselundstenjensen/itu-sdse-project)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add "course" after "Software Engineering" and finish the sentence with a period.

This project is part of the Software Development and Software Engineering at ITU. The original project description can be found [here](https://github.com/lasselundstenjensen/itu-sdse-project)

A short description of the project.
In this project we were tasked with restructuring a Python monolith using the concepts we have learned throughout the course. This project contains a [Dagger workflow](https://github.com/PLtier/github-dagger-workflow-project/blob/main/pipeline.go) and a [GitHub workflow](https://github.com/PLtier/github-dagger-workflow-project/blob/main/.github/workflows/test_action.yml).
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe add "structuring an MLOps workflow" in the end of the sentence.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Where is exactly do you mean?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Exactly where you placed it 😉

Copy link
Collaborator

@SebWae SebWae left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the documentation covers our needs and the scope of the project. I've added some comments suggesting minor changes.

@SebWae SebWae self-requested a review December 18, 2024 21:58
SebWae
SebWae previously approved these changes Dec 18, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@SebWae SebWae left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For me this is approved. But @PLtier feel free to add additional documentation if you think it is needed.

This project is part of the Software Development and Software Engineering at ITU. The original project description can be found [here](https://github.com/lasselundstenjensen/itu-sdse-project)

A short description of the project.
In this project we were tasked with restructuring a Python monolith using the concepts we have learned throughout the course. This project contains a [Dagger workflow](https://github.com/PLtier/github-dagger-workflow-project/blob/main/pipeline.go) and a [GitHub workflow](https://github.com/PLtier/github-dagger-workflow-project/blob/main/.github/workflows/test_action.yml).
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Exactly where you placed it 😉

SebWae
SebWae previously approved these changes Dec 19, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@SebWae SebWae left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very thoroughly documentation. I think everything is documented now.

@SebWae SebWae self-requested a review December 19, 2024 11:22
@adam-rosenorn adam-rosenorn merged commit 483cf1d into main Dec 19, 2024
2 checks passed
@adam-rosenorn adam-rosenorn deleted the documentation branch December 19, 2024 11:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants