Skip to content

Conversation

@JesseJohn7
Copy link
Contributor

@JesseJohn7 JesseJohn7 commented Nov 21, 2025

Description

Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue. Please also include relevant motivation and context.

Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update
  • Performance improvement
  • Code refactoring
  • Tests

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

  • Test A
  • Test B

Test Configuration:

  • Node version:
  • Browser (if applicable):
  • Operating System:

Screenshots (if applicable)

Add screenshots to help explain your changes.

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have added screenshots if ui has been changed
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

Additional context

Add any other context about the pull request here.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated table formatting in documentation to center-align the logo row for improved visual presentation.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 21, 2025

👷 Deploy request for appcut pending review.

Visit the deploys page to approve it

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 5e97781

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 21, 2025

@JesseJohn7 is attempting to deploy a commit to the OpenCut OSS Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 21, 2025

Walkthrough

The README.md file is updated to change the alignment of a table header cell containing a logo from left-aligned to center-aligned, modifying the table layout styling in the document header.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
README formatting
README.md
Changed table header cell alignment from left to center for the logo row

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

A logo centered, oh what delight! 🐰
Left to center, now sitting just right,
The table looks balanced, aligned with such grace,
A hop and a skip through this formatting space! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The description is entirely a placeholder template with no actual content filled in; no change summary, motivation, type selection, testing details, or context are provided. Fill in the description template with actual details about the alignment change, select the appropriate change type, describe testing performed, and complete relevant checklist items.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: modifying table cell alignment in README.md, which matches the actual modification made.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Tip

📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!

You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.

  • Provide your own instructions using the high_level_summary_instructions setting.
  • Format the summary however you like (bullet lists, tables, multi-section layouts, contributor stats, etc.).
  • Use high_level_summary_in_walkthrough to move the summary from the description to the walkthrough section.

Example instruction:

"Divide the high-level summary into five sections:

  1. 📝 Description — Summarize the main change in 50–60 words, explaining what was done.
  2. 📓 References — List relevant issues, discussions, documentation, or related PRs.
  3. 📦 Dependencies & Requirements — Mention any new/updated dependencies, environment variable changes, or configuration updates.
  4. 📊 Contributor Summary — Include a Markdown table showing contributions:
    | Contributor | Lines Added | Lines Removed | Files Changed |
  5. ✔️ Additional Notes — Add any extra reviewer context.
    Keep each section concise (under 200 words) and use bullet or numbered lists for clarity."

Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

1-11: Consider replacing inline HTML attributes with modern CSS or markdown styling.

The table uses inline align attributes, which are legacy HTML and not ideal for maintainability. For future improvements, consider:

  • Using markdown table syntax if GitHub's markdown renderer supports the desired alignment
  • Or adding a <style> block at the top of the file with CSS classes
  • Or using modern HTML with inline style attributes (e.g., style="text-align: center;")

This is not a blocker for the current PR, but worth noting for future refactoring.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bee7aba and 5e97781.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)

3-3: Looks good—logo is now centered.

The change from left to center alignment for the logo cell is a reasonable design improvement for the README header.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant