Skip to content

Conversation

@h-mayorquin
Copy link
Contributor

@h-mayorquin h-mayorquin commented Dec 10, 2025

Moved here from hdmf-dev/hdmf#1354 at the request of @rly

Checklist

  • Did you update CHANGELOG.md with your changes?
  • Have you checked our Contributing document?
  • Have you ensured the PR clearly describes the problem and the solution?
  • Is your contribution compliant with our coding style? This can be checked running ruff check . && codespell from the source directory.
  • Have you checked to ensure that there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same change?
  • Have you included the relevant issue number using "Fix #XXX" notation where XXX is the issue number? By including "Fix #XXX" you allow GitHub to close issue #XXX when the PR is merged.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 10, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 95.14%. Comparing base (7e100c2) to head (f84078f).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev    #2149      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.23%   95.14%   -0.10%     
==========================================
  Files          29       29              
  Lines        2876     2884       +8     
  Branches      740      742       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits         2739     2744       +5     
- Misses         83       85       +2     
- Partials       54       55       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 74.27% <12.50%> (-0.18%) ⬇️
unit 84.88% <100.00%> (-0.07%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

# Render the contents directly without the wrapper
html_repr = ""
for item_key, item_value in value.items():
item_access_code = f"{access_code}['{item_key}']"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you remove the ".data_interfaces" in the tooltip/hover?

Image

@h-mayorquin h-mayorquin deleted the improve_html_repr_processing_module branch December 12, 2025 22:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants