Add support for winget and chocolatey package counts on Windows #182
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
grtcdr
reviewed
Jan 23, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
closes #181
Chocolatey package count is very straight forward, as it just counts the directories under
C:\ProgramData\chocolatey\lib, which is consistent withchocolatey list.For winget, I made use of an sqlite3 database under
C:\Users\Username\AppData\Local\Packages\Microsoft.DesktopAppInstaller_8wekyb3d8bbwe\LocalState\Microsoft.Winget.Source_8wekyb3d8bbwe\installed.db, that contains a tableidswith entries for each package that is explicitly installed withwinget.winget listlists a bunch more packages as installed bywinget, e.g.Microsoft OneDriveandCortana, but since those were not installed by the user using winget and those packages that were, are included, I think this is good as is.Nevertheless, feedback by @Un1q32 or @Kodehawa from Gobidev/pfetch-rs#69 for this is welcome.