Fix stricter module name resolution in Julia 1.12

[mofeing]

fixes #1943

[baggepinnen]

The error went away 🎉

Still got tripped up on

julia> allowscalar(true)
┌ Warning: It's not recommended to use allowscalar([true]) to allow scalar indexing.
│ Instead, use `allowscalar() do end` or `@allowscalar` to denote exactly which operations can use scalar operations.
└ @ GPUArraysCore ~/.julia/packages/GPUArraysCore/aNaXo/src/GPUArraysCore.jl:184

julia> cr = @compile create(Ar, Br, Cr, Q1r, Q2r, Q3r, Ts, umin_r, umax_r; Np=20)
ERROR: MethodError: no method matching exp!(::Reactant.TracedRArray{Float64, 2})
The function `exp!` exists, but no method is defined for this combination of argument types.

Closest candidates are:
  exp!(::StridedMatrix{T}) where T<:Union{Float32, Float64, ComplexF64, ComplexF32}
   @ LinearAlgebra ~/.julia/juliaup/julia-1.12.2+0.x64.linux.gnu/share/julia/stdlib/v1.12/LinearAlgebra/src/dense.jl:726

but that's another story

[mofeing]

It seems like the ExplicitImport "Self Qualified Accesses" tests are failing on exactly the solution to this bug:

Module `Reactant` has self-qualified accesses:
  - `MLIR` was accessed as `Reactant.MLIR` inside `Reactant` at `/Users/runner/work/Reactant.jl/Reactant.jl/src/utils.jl:247:44`
  - `Ops` was accessed as `Reactant.Ops` inside `Reactant` at `/Users/runner/work/Reactant.jl/Reactant.jl/src/utils.jl:245:43`
  - `TracedUtils` was accessed as `Reactant.TracedUtils` inside `Reactant` at `/Users/runner/work/Reactant.jl/Reactant.jl/src/utils.jl:246:44`

Problem is that the "utils.jl" is included before the Ops and TracedUtils modules are defined, and apparently, in Julia 1.12, this is no longer valid due to some stricter module name resolution (checkout error message in #1943).

It should also be fixable by moving the include("utils.jl") to the end but that looks a lil bit fragile to me...

@avik-pal is it ok if we relax the "Self Qualified Accesses" test?

[avik-pal]

@ericphanson would you happen to know if there is a fix to this other than disabling the check?