Skip to content

Conversation

@cagdasfil
Copy link
Collaborator

@cagdasfil cagdasfil commented Mar 3, 2025

Release 0.1.3

Fixed

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release v0.1.3 introduces updates that enhance the management of secure data and system reliability. An issue affecting the secret data generation process has been resolved, and the version has been updated to align with the latest improvements.

  • Bug Fixes
    • Fixed an issue in the secret management workflow to ensure correct handling of secure information.
  • Chores
    • Updated the version number to 0.1.3 to incorporate these improvements.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 3, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the version information and corrects a logic error in the secret generation process. The update increments the plugin version from 0.1.2 to 0.1.3, and the fix ensures that the proper key name is checked (rather than an obfuscated value) during the generation of a C++ file for secrets. No changes were made to any exported or public entities.

Changes

File(s) Summary
CHANGELOG.md Added a new version entry (0.1.3) documenting a fix where the obfuscated value check was replaced with the correct key name check.
secretsvaultplugin/build.gradle.kts Updated the version number from "0.1.2" to "0.1.3" to reflect the changes made.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant SecretGenerator
    participant FileWriter

    User->>SecretGenerator: Request C++ secrets file generation
    SecretGenerator->>SecretGenerator: Check key name (corrected logic)
    SecretGenerator->>FileWriter: Generate file with correct key check
    FileWriter-->>SecretGenerator: Return file generation status
    SecretGenerator-->>User: Deliver generated file
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Poem

Hop along the code today,
Bugs and errors far away,
Secrets now with key in sight,
Version bumped – the code is right,
With each line, I leap with cheer,
A rabbit’s joy as fixes appear!
🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)

1-4: Refine Heading Levels for Consistency

The new changelog entry for version 0.1.3 uses a level 1 heading (# 0.1.3) immediately followed by a level 3 heading (### Fixed). Markdown lint (MD001) recommends that heading levels increment by only one level. Consider changing the subheading to a level 2 (## Fixed) to maintain a consistent hierarchy.

-### Fixed
+## Fixed
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)

3-3: Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time
Expected: h2; Actual: h3

(MD001, heading-increment)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c0f26bb and 7b11a8d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • secretsvaultplugin/build.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • secretsvaultplugin/build.gradle.kts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
CHANGELOG.md

3-3: Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time
Expected: h2; Actual: h3

(MD001, heading-increment)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: build

@cagdasfil cagdasfil merged commit 069629e into main Mar 3, 2025
2 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 11, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants