Skip to content

Conversation

@ktf
Copy link
Member

@ktf ktf commented Nov 23, 2025

No description provided.

@ktf ktf requested a review from a team as a code owner November 23, 2025 17:04
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION RELEASES:
To request your PR to be included in production software, please add the corresponding labels called "async-" to your PR. Add the labels directly (if you have the permissions) or add a comment of the form (note that labels are separated by a ",")

+async-label <label1>, <label2>, !<label3> ...

This will add <label1> and <label2> and removes <label3>.

The following labels are available
async-2023-pbpb-apass4
async-2023-pp-apass4
async-2024-pp-apass1
async-2022-pp-apass7
async-2024-pp-cpass0
async-2024-PbPb-apass1
async-2024-ppRef-apass1
async-2024-PbPb-apass2
async-2023-PbPb-apass5

@alibuild
Copy link
Collaborator

Error while checking build/O2/fullCI_slc9 for 40b4056 at 2025-11-23 18:56:

## sw/BUILD/O2-latest/log
CMake Error at /sw/slc9_x86-64/CMake/v3.31.6-6/share/cmake-3.31/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:233 (message):

Full log here.

@ktf
Copy link
Member Author

ktf commented Nov 24, 2025

@davidrohr there is a complain about vulkan in CMake for the fullCI. Did anything change since friday?

@davidrohr
Copy link
Collaborator

Was anything changed wrt the build container? docker pull registry.cern.ch/alisw/slc9-gpu-builder:latest still gives me the container I used before which is some months old.
For sure nothing has changed in O2 that can explain this. It is basically CMake detection for Vulkan, which is failing.
I am now trying locally here.

@davidrohr
Copy link
Collaborator

So, compiling O2 in that container, I get

Found Vulkan: /lib64/libvulkan.so (found version "1.4.304") found components: glslc missing components: glslangValidator

while in the O2 build in the FullCI of this PR, I see

Could NOT find Vulkan (missing: Vulkan_LIBRARY Vulkan_INCLUDE_DIR) (found version "")

@ktf ktf merged commit 72b9f51 into AliceO2Group:dev Nov 24, 2025
9 of 12 checks passed
@ktf
Copy link
Member Author

ktf commented Nov 24, 2025

Change only in test. Error unrelated.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants