Skip to content

Conversation

@ktf
Copy link
Member

@ktf ktf commented Aug 18, 2025

@ktf ktf requested a review from a team as a code owner August 18, 2025 06:40
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION RELEASES:
To request your PR to be included in production software, please add the corresponding labels called "async-" to your PR. Add the labels directly (if you have the permissions) or add a comment of the form (note that labels are separated by a ",")

+async-label <label1>, <label2>, !<label3> ...

This will add <label1> and <label2> and removes <label3>.

The following labels are available
async-2023-pbpb-apass4
async-2023-pp-apass4
async-2024-pp-apass1
async-2022-pp-apass7
async-2024-pp-cpass0
async-2024-PbPb-apass1
async-2024-ppRef-apass1
async-2024-PbPb-apass2
async-2023-PbPb-apass5

@ktf
Copy link
Member Author

ktf commented Aug 18, 2025

I need to think about it. The analysis fetcher might actually have to have a separate codepath. This is because each table (which maps to an output route) contains pointers more than one CCDB object.

@ktf ktf changed the title DPL CCDB: move helper class to shared header DPL: adapt reconstruction CCDB Fetcher to use the new CCDBFetcherHelper Aug 20, 2025
ktf added 2 commits August 21, 2025 09:14
Thanks to the newly added binary view columns we can finally support
proper CCDB integration in analysis.

In order to do so, the user needs to create a TIMESTAMPED table, i.e. a table
which is an extension of another one where the timestamps for each rows
are provided. The extra columns of such timestamped table will be CCDB columns
where the iterator of each provides access for one specified CCDB object.
@ktf
Copy link
Member Author

ktf commented Aug 22, 2025

Closing this for now. Not strictly needed.

@ktf ktf closed this Aug 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant