Skip to content

Inbound webhook API #63

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
santoshkumarradha wants to merge 7 commits into from
Closed

Inbound webhook API #63

santoshkumarradha wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

@santoshkumarradha
Copy link
Member

@santoshkumarradha santoshkumarradha commented Dec 11, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Summary

  • add generic inbound webhook schema (triggers/deliveries), storage layer, and mapping/signature utilities
  • expose API-only CRUD + example + delivery listing + receiver endpoints with HMAC + idempotency
  • add functional webhook flow test (docker), plus unit tests across mapping/signature/storage/handlers

Testing

  • go test ./... (control-plane)
  • make test-functional-local (pending: requires OpenRouter key & docker run)

Notes

  • PR rebased to include only webhook scope (no serverless/UI changes).

TODO:

  • CP
  • UI

@santoshkumarradha santoshkumarradha changed the title Santosh/webhook triggers Inbound webhook API Dec 11, 2025
github-advanced-security[bot]
github-advanced-security bot found potential problems Dec 11, 2025
View reviewed changes
github-advanced-security[bot]
github-advanced-security bot found potential problems Dec 11, 2025
View reviewed changes
@santoshkumarradha
Copy link
Member Author

santoshkumarradha commented Dec 11, 2025

you-got-this-good-luck-today-gif-by-moodman

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@santoshkumarradha