|
| 1 | +========================== |
| 2 | +Open Source WG: 10/28/2025 |
| 3 | +========================== |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +Recording: A recording of the meeting is available in the Linux Foundation https://openprofile.dev/ profile. If you are |
| 6 | +a member of the Working Group you can access this through your account. |
| 7 | + |
| 8 | +Attendees |
| 9 | +========= |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +* Hamza Butt - Arm |
| 12 | +* Megan Knight - Arm |
| 13 | + |
| 14 | +* Deepika H V - Centre for Development of Advanced Computing |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +* Vadim Pirogov - Intel |
| 17 | +* Kuldeep Pal - Intel |
| 18 | +* Alexey Kukanov - Intel |
| 19 | +* Alison Richards - Intel |
| 20 | +* Nikolay Petrov - Intel |
| 21 | +* Timmie Smith - Intel |
| 22 | +* John Melonakos - Intel |
| 23 | +* Mike Voss - Intel |
| 24 | +* Maria Kraynyuk - Intel |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +Next Steps |
| 28 | +========== |
| 29 | + |
| 30 | +* Megan Knight: Run the OFAC sanctions paragraph by LF Legal and get assurance that they can recommend other projects adopt this language |
| 31 | +* John: Publish the OFAC sanctions paragraph on the GitHub security page once approved by LF Legal |
| 32 | +* Megan Knight: Email Melissa to find out who is on the security email alias |
| 33 | +* Megan Knight and John: Create a process or procedure for routing security emails to both chairs and project security delegates, and document it |
| 34 | +* John: Publish the spec V1.5 mid-November with the current state as of November 7 code freeze date |
| 35 | +* Alison: Send the sitemap for the new website to Megan and John for review |
| 36 | +* John: Follow up on email thread about meeting with Chris regarding oneMath maintainer role |
| 37 | +* John: Connect all the dots regarding potential oneMath maintainer contributors and loop in Maria |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | +Summary |
| 40 | +======= |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | +Intel Namespace Access Discussion: |
| 43 | +================================== |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +Hamza joined to discuss access to a specific branch of an Intel namespace project. They agreed that the Intel engineers |
| 46 | +would update the branch for them. The group waited for more participants to join before starting the agenda, with Megan |
| 47 | +inviting anyone with additional topics to add them to the chat. They reviewed a draft paragraph about OFAC sanctions for |
| 48 | +inclusion on their Security Procedures GitHub page. |
| 49 | + |
| 50 | +October Agenda and OFAC Review: |
| 51 | +=============================== |
| 52 | + |
| 53 | +The team reviewed and discussed the October agenda, focusing on OFAC sanctions enforcement language. Megan agreed to |
| 54 | +have the LF legal team review the proposed language, with the goal of potentially encouraging other projects to adopt |
| 55 | +it. The team also discussed the need to clarify the security email alias recipients and potentially create a documented |
| 56 | +process for security responses. Finally, they confirmed the code freeze date for spec V1.5 as November 7, with John |
| 57 | +planning to publish the spec mid-November. |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | +Specifications Update and Website Planning: |
| 60 | +=========================================== |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | +John expressed concerns about the state of specifications, noting that projects have not focused much on updating them, |
| 63 | +instead prioritizing open-source work. He mentioned that some specifications have changed, but the updates have not been |
| 64 | +reflected, which could lead to issues as more hardware vendors adopt the specifications. John plans to publish the |
| 65 | +current state of specifications and suggested conducting a gut check with components to address potential |
| 66 | +gaps. Meanwhile, Alison discussed wireframes for a new website, specifically an open-source page on oneapi.io, and |
| 67 | +planned to review the sitemap with Megan for further input. |
| 68 | + |
| 69 | +UXL Foundation Website Redesign Updates: |
| 70 | +======================================== |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | +The team discussed updates on the UXL Foundation website redesign, which aims to better showcase the oneAPI |
| 73 | +specification and provide clear guidance on getting started with GitHub. Alison emphasized the importance of gathering |
| 74 | +content from component teams and encouraged members to contribute blog posts about events or UXL activities. John |
| 75 | +expressed excitement about the new website and highlighted the need for polished content from each component. The group |
| 76 | +also touched on the potential inclusion of the oneMCC (one Memory Component Controller) in the foundation, with plans to |
| 77 | +form a new Special Interest Group (SIG) and seek steering committee approval. Finally, Alison mentioned a limited UXL |
| 78 | +presence at an upcoming event with representatives from Google and Intel. |
| 79 | + |
| 80 | +oneDNN Release and RISC-V Support: |
| 81 | +================================== |
| 82 | + |
| 83 | +Vadim reported that oneDNN is preparing for the 3.10 release and is working on RISC-V support with active contributor |
| 84 | +involvement. He noted a challenge regarding the coordination of oneDNN updates across different platforms, with Hamza |
| 85 | +working on independent updates for ARM. Nikolay discussed the completion of several RFCs for deprecating and removing |
| 86 | +older functionality in oneDAL, which will be implemented in the next major release planned for next year. |
| 87 | + |
| 88 | +oneMath Maintainer Recruitment Drive: |
| 89 | +===================================== |
| 90 | + |
| 91 | +Maria reported that oneMath is preparing for release 0.9 next week but faces a challenge with a significant reduction in |
| 92 | +maintainers. She requested help from the community and known oneMath users to support the project and allocate more |
| 93 | +resources. John mentioned ongoing discussions at the steering committee level about potential new contributors and |
| 94 | +maintainers, including conversations with Chris and other contributors. He agreed to follow up on the email thread and |
| 95 | +connect the dots regarding potential new maintainers. |
| 96 | + |
| 97 | +Project Updates and Release Planning: |
| 98 | +===================================== |
| 99 | + |
| 100 | +The team discussed project updates for oneTBB and oneDPL, with both projects on track to complete remaining PRs for spec |
| 101 | +updates by November 7th. oneDPL also merged major work introducing C++ range-based parallel algorithms for SQL devices, |
| 102 | +and plans an open-source only release soon, with a larger release planned for March or April next year. John noted that |
| 103 | +each GitHub project governs itself independently and should be documented on GitHub, while Megan confirmed the |
| 104 | +established process for delegating maintainers. |
0 commit comments