Address comments

Author: biboudis

docs/docs/reference/changed/eta-expansion-spec.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 layout: doc-page
-title: "Automatic Eta Expansion"
+title: "Automatic Eta Expansion - More Details"
 ---
 
 ### Motivation
@@ -47,25 +47,6 @@ f1: (Boolean, String) => Int => List[Int]
 f2: Int => List[Int]
 ```
 
-## Automatic eta-expansion and nullary methods
-
-Automatic eta expansion does not apply to "nullary" methods that take an empty parameter list. Given
-
-```scala
-def next(): T
-```
-
-A simple reference to `next` does not auto-convert to a function.
-One has to write explicitly `() => next()` to achieve that
-Once again since the `_` is going to be deprecated it's better to write it this way
-rather than `next _`.
-
-The reason for excluding nullary methods from automatic eta expansion
-is that Scala implicitly inserts the `()` argument, which would
-conflict with eta expansion. Automatic `()` insertion is
-[limited](../dropped/auto-apply.md) in Dotty, but the fundamental ambiguity
-remains.
-
 ## Automatic eta-expansion and implicit parameter lists
 
 Methods with implicit parameter lists will always get applied to implicit arguments.

docs/docs/reference/changed/eta-expansion.md

@@ -17,5 +17,26 @@ f1: (Boolean, String) => Int => List[Int]
 f2: Int => List[Int]
 ```
 
+The syntax `m _` is no longer needed and will be deprecated in the future.
+
+## Automatic eta-expansion and nullary methods
+
+Automatic eta expansion does not apply to "nullary" methods that take an empty parameter list.
+
+```scala
+def next(): T
+```
+
+Given a simple reference to `next` does not auto-convert to a function.
+One has to write explicitly `() => next()` to achieve that
+Once again since the `_` is going to be deprecated it's better to write it this way
+rather than `next _`.
+
+The reason for excluding nullary methods from automatic eta expansion
+is that Scala implicitly inserts the `()` argument, which would
+conflict with eta expansion. Automatic `()` insertion is
+[limited](../dropped/auto-apply.md) in Dotty, but the fundamental ambiguity
+remains.
+
 [More details](eta-expansion-spec.html)