Investigate original sources of flaws

[samm82]

Migrated from #169 as to be non-blocking

I should track down where flaws with an "original source" actually come from, since these original sources may have extra context or be "more correct" in the game of "citation telephone". Main foci based on frequency:

• Hetzel, 1988
• Black, 2009
• IEEE 1044-2009
• Reid, 1996
  • Flaws that appear in thesis
  • Difference between branch/decision testing (this will inform the merit of a potential flaw)
  • Data that appear in glossary (if any)
  • Sec. 5 State Transition Testing and Chow's Coverage (a potential rabbit hole)
  • Sec. 11 Choosing the 'Best' Techniques (an argument for why there are so many; will likely just bloat thesis)
  • Annex A - Control Flow Graph Schemata (another potential rabbit hole)
• PMBOK (5th edition)
  • Conformance
  • Quality Audits
  • Other relevant information (probably from a more up-to-date version)
• IEEE 982-2024
• IEEE, 2015
• ISO/IEC, 2014
• ISO/IEC, 2005
• Lyu, 1996