BUG: Raise OutOfBoundsDatetime when Period is constructed from invalid high-resolution Timestamp (#63278)

Author: pavansai018

pandas/_libs/tslibs/period.pyx

@@ -849,7 +849,9 @@ cdef int64_t _period_ordinal_safe(npy_datetimestruct *dts, int freq) except? -1:
     except OverflowError as err:
         # Translate low-level overflow into a user-facing OutOfBoundsDatetime.
         fmt = dts_to_iso_string(dts)
-        raise OutOfBoundsDatetime(f"Out of bounds datetime for Period with freq {freq}: {fmt}") from err
+        raise OutOfBoundsDatetime(
+            f"Out of bounds datetime for Period with freq {freq}: {fmt}"
+            ) from err
 
 
 cdef void get_date_info(int64_t ordinal,
@@ -1189,7 +1191,7 @@ cpdef int64_t period_ordinal(int y, int m, int d, int h, int min,
     dts.sec = s
     dts.us = us
     dts.ps = ps
-    #return get_period_ordinal(&dts, freq)
+    # return get_period_ordinal(&dts, freq)
     return _period_ordinal_safe(&dts, freq)
 
 

pandas/tests/tslibs/test_period.py

@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
 import numpy as np
 import pytest
-import pandas as pd
+
 from pandas._libs.tslibs import (
+    OutOfBoundsDatetime,
     iNaT,
     to_offset,
-    OutOfBoundsDatetime,
 )
 from pandas._libs.tslibs.period import (
     extract_ordinals,
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
     period_ordinal,
 )
 
+import pandas as pd
 import pandas._testing as tm
 
 
@@ -123,9 +124,10 @@ def test_get_period_field_array_raises_on_out_of_range():
     with pytest.raises(ValueError, match=msg):
         get_period_field_arr(-1, np.empty(1), 0)
 
+
 def test_period_from_overflow_timestamp_raises():
     # Construct a deliberately broken Timestamp
     ts = pd.Timestamp(pd.Timestamp.min.value, unit="us")
 
     with pytest.raises(OutOfBoundsDatetime):
-        pd.Period(ts, freq="us")
+        pd.Period(ts, freq="us")