loop: Fix ABBA locking race

[ Upstream commit b491255 ]

Current loop calls vfs_statfs() while holding the q->limits_lock. If
FS takes some locking in vfs_statfs callback, this may lead to ABBA
locking bug (at least, FAT fs has this issue actually).

So this patch calls vfs_statfs() outside q->limits_locks instead,
because looks like no reason to hold q->limits_locks while getting
discord configs.

Chain exists of:
  &sbi->fat_lock --> &q->q_usage_counter(io)#17 --> &q->limits_lock

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&q->limits_lock);
                               lock(&q->q_usage_counter(io)#17);
                               lock(&q->limits_lock);
  lock(&sbi->fat_lock);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

Reported-by: syzbot+a5d8c609c02f508672cc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=a5d8c609c02f508672cc
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Stable-dep-of: f5c84ef ("loop: Add sanity check for read/write_iter")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit 0558ce095b767ab70e686f556f9adfb1805812fb)
Signed-off-by: Jack Vogel <jack.vogel@oracle.com>

Author: OGAWAHirofumi

drivers/block/loop.c

@@ -694,12 +694,11 @@ static void loop_sysfs_exit(struct loop_device *lo)
 				   &loop_attribute_group);
 }
 
-static void loop_config_discard(struct loop_device *lo,
-		struct queue_limits *lim)
+static void loop_get_discard_config(struct loop_device *lo,
+				    u32 *granularity, u32 *max_discard_sectors)
 {
 	struct file *file = lo->lo_backing_file;
 	struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host;
-	u32 granularity = 0, max_discard_sectors = 0;
 	struct kstatfs sbuf;
 
 	/*
@@ -712,24 +711,17 @@ static void loop_config_discard(struct loop_device *lo,
 	if (S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode)) {
 		struct block_device *bdev = I_BDEV(inode);
 
-		max_discard_sectors = bdev_write_zeroes_sectors(bdev);
-		granularity = bdev_discard_granularity(bdev);
+		*max_discard_sectors = bdev_write_zeroes_sectors(bdev);
+		*granularity = bdev_discard_granularity(bdev);
 
 	/*
 	 * We use punch hole to reclaim the free space used by the
 	 * image a.k.a. discard.
 	 */
 	} else if (file->f_op->fallocate && !vfs_statfs(&file->f_path, &sbuf)) {
-		max_discard_sectors = UINT_MAX >> 9;
-		granularity = sbuf.f_bsize;
+		*max_discard_sectors = UINT_MAX >> 9;
+		*granularity = sbuf.f_bsize;
 	}
-
-	lim->max_hw_discard_sectors = max_discard_sectors;
-	lim->max_write_zeroes_sectors = max_discard_sectors;
-	if (max_discard_sectors)
-		lim->discard_granularity = granularity;
-	else
-		lim->discard_granularity = 0;
 }
 
 struct loop_worker {
@@ -915,6 +907,7 @@ static int loop_reconfigure_limits(struct loop_device *lo, unsigned int bsize)
 	struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host;
 	struct block_device *backing_bdev = NULL;
 	struct queue_limits lim;
+	u32 granularity = 0, max_discard_sectors = 0;
 
 	if (S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode))
 		backing_bdev = I_BDEV(inode);
@@ -924,6 +917,8 @@ static int loop_reconfigure_limits(struct loop_device *lo, unsigned int bsize)
 	if (!bsize)
 		bsize = loop_default_blocksize(lo, backing_bdev);
 
+	loop_get_discard_config(lo, &granularity, &max_discard_sectors);
+
 	lim = queue_limits_start_update(lo->lo_queue);
 	lim.logical_block_size = bsize;
 	lim.physical_block_size = bsize;
@@ -933,7 +928,12 @@ static int loop_reconfigure_limits(struct loop_device *lo, unsigned int bsize)
 		lim.features |= BLK_FEAT_WRITE_CACHE;
 	if (backing_bdev && !bdev_nonrot(backing_bdev))
 		lim.features |= BLK_FEAT_ROTATIONAL;
-	loop_config_discard(lo, &lim);
+	lim.max_hw_discard_sectors = max_discard_sectors;
+	lim.max_write_zeroes_sectors = max_discard_sectors;
+	if (max_discard_sectors)
+		lim.discard_granularity = granularity;
+	else
+		lim.discard_granularity = 0;
 	return queue_limits_commit_update(lo->lo_queue, &lim);
 }