Striving toward translation: strategies for reliable fMRI measurement - ScienceDirect

[gkiar]

URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364661321001297

• No mention of the reliability of psychometrics, which feels like a deliberate oversight?
• Did MSC or these folks coin "pfMRI"? It feels like an unnecessary and misleading distinction when all it means is longer sessions...
• the "use stable variability" point pretty is pretty clearly summarized to contradict the earlier point about using pfMRI? Conceptually the idea of using stable variability is consistent with a lot of what we look at (e.g. Ting's MGC work).
• Task design point was overly vague and too big of a fish to be useful, imo

Related to my variability perspective:

• are we aiming at TICS or TINS? If TINS, do we still mention this?
• "A review recently published in TICS [#] discusses various elements of data acquisition which could lead to more reliable brain networks; however, our work distinctly tackles this issue from the perspective of analysts and data consumers, and thus arrives at unique conclusions for improving the robustness of results and models of individual differences"