Rename images book 3

Author: hollasch

books/RayTracingTheRestOfYourLife.html

@@ -798,7 +798,7 @@
 <div class='together'>
 At 500×500 my code produces this image in 10min on 1 core of my Macbook:
 
-  ![Cornell box, refactored](../images/img.cornell-refactor1.jpg class=pixel)
+  ![Image 1: Cornell box, refactored](../images/img-3.01-cornell-refactor1.jpg class=pixel)
 
 Reducing that noise is our goal. We’ll do that by constructing a PDF that sends more rays to the
 light.
@@ -941,7 +941,8 @@
 <div class='together'>
 And again I _should_ get the same picture except with different variance, but I don’t!
 
-  ![Cornell box, with different sampling strategy](../images/img.cornell-refactor2.jpg class=pixel)
+  ![Image 2: Cornell box, with different sampling strategy
+  ](../images/img-3.02-cornell-refactor2.jpg class=pixel)
 
 </div>
 
@@ -1309,8 +1310,8 @@
 <div class='together'>
 Which produces:
 
-  ![Cornell box, with orthonormal basis scatter function
-  ](../images/img.cornell-ortho.jpg class=pixel)
+  ![Image 3: Cornell box, with orthonormal basis scatter function
+  ](../images/img-3.03-cornell-ortho.jpg class=pixel)
 
 Is that right? We still don’t know for sure. Tracking down bugs is hard in the absence of reliable
 reference solutions. Let’s table that for now and get rid of some of that noise.
@@ -1415,8 +1416,8 @@
 <div class='together'>
 With 10 samples per pixel this yields:
 
-  ![Cornell box, sampling only the light, 10 samples per pixel
-  ](../images/img.cornell-samplight.jpg class=pixel)
+  ![Image 4: Cornell box, sampling only the light, 10 samples per pixel
+  ](../images/img-3.04-cornell-sample-light.jpg class=pixel)
 
 </div>
 
@@ -1447,8 +1448,8 @@
 <div class='together'>
 We also need to flip the light so its normals point in the -y direction. This gives us:
 
-  ![Cornell box, light emitted only in the downward direction
-  ](../images/img.cornell-lightdown.jpg class=pixel)
+  ![Image 5: Cornell box, light emitted only in the downward direction
+  ](../images/img-3.05-cornell-lightdown.jpg class=pixel)
 
 </div>
 
@@ -1597,7 +1598,8 @@
 This yields an apparently matching result so all we’ve done so far is refactor where `pdf` is
 computed:
 
-  ![Cornell box with a cosine density _pdf_](../images/img.cornell-cospdf.jpg class=pixel)
+  ![Image 6: Cornell box with a cosine density _pdf_
+  ](../images/img-3.06-cornell-cos-pdf.jpg class=pixel)
 
 </div>
 
@@ -1725,8 +1727,8 @@
 <div class='together'>
 At 10 samples per pixel we get:
 
-  ![Cornell box, sampling a hittable light, 10 samples per pixel
-  ](../images/img.cornell-samphit.jpg class=pixel)
+  ![Image 7: Cornell box, sampling a hittable light, 10 samples per pixel
+  ](../images/img-3.07-hittable-light.jpg class=pixel)
 
 </div>
 
@@ -1817,8 +1819,8 @@
 <div class='together'>
 1000 samples per pixel yields:
 
-  ![Cornell box, mixture density of cosine and light sampling
-  ](../images/img.cornell-coslight.jpg class=pixel)
+  ![Image 8: Cornell box, mixture density of cosine and light sampling
+  ](../images/img-3.08-cosine-and-light.jpg class=pixel)
 
 </div>
 
@@ -2149,7 +2151,8 @@
 The resulting image has a noisy reflection on the ceiling because the directions toward the box are
 not sampled with more density.
 
-  ![Cornell box with arbitrary PDF functions](../images/img.cornell-flexpdf.jpg class=pixel)
+  ![Image 9: Cornell box with arbitrary PDF functions
+  ](../images/img-3.09-arbitrary-pdf.jpg class=pixel)
 
 </div>
 
@@ -2294,8 +2297,8 @@
 sampling the light did for my code. This is probably because those rays that hit the glass are
 expensive!
 
-  ![Cornell box with glass sphere, using new PDF functions
-  ](../images/img.cornell-glass.jpg class=pixel)
+  ![Image 10: Cornell box with glass sphere, using new PDF functions
+  ](../images/img-3.10-cornell-glass-sphere.jpg class=pixel)
 
 </div>
 
@@ -2341,8 +2344,8 @@
 <div class='together'>
 And we get a decent image with 1000 samples as before:
 
-  ![Cornell box, using a mixture of glass & light PDFs
-  ](../images/img.cornell-glasslight.jpg class=pixel)
+  ![Image 11: Cornell Cornell box, using a mixture of glass & light PDFs
+  ](../images/img-3.11-glass-and-light.jpg class=pixel)
 
 </div>
 
@@ -2402,7 +2405,8 @@
 <div class='together'>
 Happily, the black specks are gone:
 
-  ![Cornell box with anti-acne color function](../images/img.book3-final.jpg class=pixel)
+  ![Image 12: Cornell box with anti-acne color function
+  ](../images/img-3.12-book3-final.jpg class=pixel)
 
 </div>