Consent prompting #82
Replies: 3 comments 2 replies
-
|
I think instead of doing this mid conversation, the consent would happen before the conversation starts. The person would set their conversation boundaries on their profile so that when they match, the other party would have to agree to respect their boundaries in the conversation. If they don't, then this would give us grounds to punish them for not respecting their boundaries. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I'm not sure if analyzing conversations is going to earn us the trust of the users. maybe a report-feature could take care of this, in combination with the idea that @ajbott suggested: specifying their boundaries beforehand (and maybe also displaying this to both parties somewhere?, so they both know what terms they are on..) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I'm not sure this is the best solution to the problem of unwanted sexual content, but it's certainly worth thinking about the options. How does this really differ from and have advantage over simply Reporting a conversation? One of the Report options could just be "Unwanted sexual advances" or whatever. We can treat different reported issues with different levels of severity and address them accordingly. So I'm not sure there's a need for a whole consent-dedicated system, or if there is I don't think it should focus just on sexual content, and perhaps starts to sound more like a mutual compatibility consideration that could either be dealt with in matching/filtering, or is more appropriate offline for those people to address between them. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
consent prompts: basically if conversation starts to turn sexual app will prompt both parties to consent or reject the conversation. If one rejects and the AI detects one party still trying to push for sexual content they get penalized
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions