Skip to content

Commit 61edae2

Browse files
authored
Update and rename 1-Draft/RFC0014-Language enhancements for collections.md to X-Rejected/RFC0014-Language enhancements for collections.md
Committee reviewed and decision added
1 parent 374e7a4 commit 61edae2

File tree

1 file changed

+30
-1
lines changed

1 file changed

+30
-1
lines changed

1-Draft/RFC0014-Language enhancements for collections.md renamed to X-Rejected/RFC0014-Language enhancements for collections.md

Lines changed: 30 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
11
---
22
RFC: RFC0014
33
Author: Aditya Patwardhan
4-
Status: Draft
4+
Status: Rejected
55
SupercededBy:
66
Version: 1.0
77
Area: LanguageAndParser
@@ -76,3 +76,32 @@ Using 'list' is proposed for System.Collections.ArrayList instead of 'ArrayList'
7676
### Scope
7777

7878
Type accelerators for generic types for collections are out of scope for this RFC. They might be addressed in future RFCs.
79+
80+
---------------
81+
## PowerShell Committee Decision
82+
83+
### Voting Results
84+
85+
Jason Shirk: Reject
86+
87+
Joey Aiello: Reject
88+
89+
Bruce Payette: Reject
90+
91+
Steve Lee: Reject
92+
93+
Hemant Mahawar: Reject
94+
95+
### Majority Decision
96+
97+
The committee reviewed this and rejected this RFC because:
98+
99+
- `using namespace System.Collections` would solve most of the examples in this RFC
100+
- The parser already has syntax for `using type list = System.Collections.ArrayList` for user defined accelerators although the implementation is not complete currently
101+
102+
Because there is an existing solution to save from typing the fully qualified typename and an existing design to enable user defined type accelerators, we decided to not accept this RFC.
103+
We should continue to look at usage data to determine if in the future we add new default accelerators.
104+
105+
### Minority Decision
106+
107+
N/A

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)